2004
DOI: 10.1017/s0017089503001642
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On Quasisimilarity for Log-Hyponormal Operators

Abstract: Abstract. In this paper we show that the normal parts of quasisimilar loghyponormal operators are unitarily equivalent. A Fuglede-Putnam type theorem for log-hyponormal operators is proved. Also, it is shown that a log-hyponormal operator that is quasisimilar to an isometry is unitary and that a log-hyponormal spectral operator is normal.2000 Mathematics Subject Classification. 47B20.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
(19 reference statements)
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There are some significant evidences for this assertion, for instance, it is proved in [14] that any operator A has a nontrivial invariant subspace if and only if so does Ã. Another interesting application deals with an application of the Aluthge transform for generalizing the Fuglede-Putnam theorem [12]. It indeed is a motivation for our work in this paper.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 84%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…There are some significant evidences for this assertion, for instance, it is proved in [14] that any operator A has a nontrivial invariant subspace if and only if so does Ã. Another interesting application deals with an application of the Aluthge transform for generalizing the Fuglede-Putnam theorem [12]. It indeed is a motivation for our work in this paper.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…[12] Let A ∈ B(H 1 ) and B * ∈ B(H 2 ) be either log-hyponormal or phyponormal operators. Then the pair(A, B)has the FP-property.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…be the polar decompositions of T 2 and S Ã 2 , respectively and Conway [10] proved that the normal parts of quasisimilar subnormal operators are unitarily equivalent and gave an example showing that the pure parts of quasisimilar subnormal operators need not be quasisimilar. This result was gener-alized to classes of p-hyponormal operators in [21] and log-hyponormal operators in [23], respectively. We prove that these results hold for class wAðs; tÞ operators with s þ t ¼ 1.…”
Section: Class Wa(s T) Operators and Quasi-similaritymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An invertible p-hyponormal operator is log-hyponormal, but the converse is false; see [17, p. 169] for a reference. Log-hyponormal and p-hyponormal operators, which share a number of properties with hyponormal operators, have been considered by a number of authors in the recent past; see [11,17,24] for further references.…”
Section: −Hyponormal Operator Is Semihyponormal) It Is An Immediatmentioning
confidence: 99%