2011
DOI: 10.1007/s00023-011-0107-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On Quantum Markov Chains on Cayley Tree II: Phase Transitions for the Associated Chain with XY-Model on the Cayley Tree of Order Three

Abstract: In the present paper, we study forward quantum Markov chains (QMC) defined on a Cayley tree. Using the tree structure of graphs, we give a construction of quantum Markov chains on a Cayley tree. By means of such constructions we prove the existence of a phase transition for the XY -model on a Cayley tree of order three in QMC scheme. By the phase transition we mean the existence of two distinct QMC for the given family of interaction operators {K x,y }.

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
24
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

4
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
(54 reference statements)
1
24
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The present paper is a continuation of our previous works [6,7]. In [6] we have introduced forward type of quantum Markov chains (QMC) defined on the Cayley tree was studied 1 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…The present paper is a continuation of our previous works [6,7]. In [6] we have introduced forward type of quantum Markov chains (QMC) defined on the Cayley tree was studied 1 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…Moreover, these states should be not quasi-equivalent and their supports do not overlap. Note that in our earlier papers (see [12,13]) we have proved only non quasi-equivalence of the states. In this paper, we additionally prove that the corresponding states do not have overlapping supports.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…In this section, we are going to demonstrate that localized QMS cannot be reduced to the one dimensional case. More precisely, we explicitly consider the potential (10).…”
Section: Why Localized Quantum Markov States On Trees Are Not Reducible To the One Dimensional Casementioning
confidence: 99%