2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2019.105440
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On projected hydrological scenarios under the influence of bias-corrected climatic variables and LULC

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To make assessments more robust, in this study we tested multiple bias correction methods with the objective to compare and better understand the methods by assessing the effects of error propagation of the bias-corrected rainfall to rainfall-runoff simulations. Several studies have tested multiple bias correction methods on rainfall inputs for rainfall-runoff modelling (Teutschbein and Seibert 2012, Fang et al 2015, Luo et al 2018, Sahoo et al 2019. For example, Luo et al (2018) found the PT and DM methods performed equally well in frequency-based statistics.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To make assessments more robust, in this study we tested multiple bias correction methods with the objective to compare and better understand the methods by assessing the effects of error propagation of the bias-corrected rainfall to rainfall-runoff simulations. Several studies have tested multiple bias correction methods on rainfall inputs for rainfall-runoff modelling (Teutschbein and Seibert 2012, Fang et al 2015, Luo et al 2018, Sahoo et al 2019. For example, Luo et al (2018) found the PT and DM methods performed equally well in frequency-based statistics.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This method normally operates where the entire data are used to calibrate the models. The moving window technique can also be applied to correct daily and monthly climatic variables and has extensively been used by [44,60]. The technique focuses on a moving window centered on each day of the year to calibrate a correction.…”
Section: Moving Window Techniquementioning
confidence: 99%
“…17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28 The ranks that every data point received were used in the test. The initial and final values of Mann-Kendall statistic's (S) is the result derived from deviations increases and decreases 29,30 Signum function (sgn) (x) = 1 for x > 0; Signum function (x) = 0 for x = 0; Signum function (x) = -1 for x < 0. The z-statistic = | S | /s 0.5.…”
Section: Trend Analysis Of Rainfallmentioning
confidence: 99%