2013
DOI: 10.1109/lcomm.2013.091113.131213
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On Probabilistic Weight Distribution of Polar Codes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…i-polar code is obtained by the recursive equation (5). The average WEF of the concatenated code is obtained as follows.…”
Section: A Analytical and Simulation Results Of I-polar Codes And Pomentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…i-polar code is obtained by the recursive equation (5). The average WEF of the concatenated code is obtained as follows.…”
Section: A Analytical and Simulation Results Of I-polar Codes And Pomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Table I gives the coefficients of WEFs of all test cases, of which the Hamming weights, denoted as d, are listed in the first column and the remaining columns are the coefficients A d of all test cases. The WEF averaged over the ensemble of i-polar codes is denoted as WEF(A), which is computed based on the recursive equation (5). Since the code size is small, the WEF of a realization of i-polar codes can be enumerated exhaustively.…”
Section: Wefs Of (32 16) I-polar Code and Polar Codementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…where A out i is the weight enumerator of the outer code and A IO,in i,ω is the input-output weight enumerator of the inner code (we remind that the average multiplicities resulting from (8) are, in general, real numbers).…”
Section: Notation and Definitionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this work we have assumed ξ = 0.99, hence at least one code belongs to the good codes ensemble. Therefore, when the expurgation method is adoptable (i.e., the first term of the AWEF has a codewords multiplicity less than ξ), through (7) and (8) the average performance of the good codes subset is derived.…”
Section: Notation and Definitionsmentioning
confidence: 99%