2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.knosys.2017.12.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On priority weights and consistency for incomplete hesitant fuzzy preference relations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
45
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 115 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
0
45
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, application of the hesitant fuzzy sets [57] to the multicriteria decision-making is rapidly growing owing to its capability to interpret vague information efficiently. Some studies (Zhang et al [58,59], Rodríguez et al [60], Yu et al [61]) have proposed hesitant fuzzy preference relation and methods for accounting its consistency. Incorporation of hesitant fuzzy preference relation as preference elicitation approach can be a significant extension of the proposed work.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, application of the hesitant fuzzy sets [57] to the multicriteria decision-making is rapidly growing owing to its capability to interpret vague information efficiently. Some studies (Zhang et al [58,59], Rodríguez et al [60], Yu et al [61]) have proposed hesitant fuzzy preference relation and methods for accounting its consistency. Incorporation of hesitant fuzzy preference relation as preference elicitation approach can be a significant extension of the proposed work.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further studies will extend the proposed method to the interval‐valued Pythagorean fuzzy set, soft set, q ‐rung orthopair fuzzy sets, and other uncertain and fuzzy environment …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Atanassov and Gargov's [3] concept of interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy sets (IVFS), which are characterized by a membership and a nonmembership functions, permits to process hesitancy information in decision making problems [19], [20], [22], [33], [34], [50], [56].…”
Section: Preliminariesmentioning
confidence: 99%