1992
DOI: 10.1007/bf01058709
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On primary elements in groups

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this article we generalize some results of [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10] and prove the theorems that are announced in [11,12].…”
mentioning
confidence: 83%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In this article we generalize some results of [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10] and prove the theorems that are announced in [11,12].…”
mentioning
confidence: 83%
“…
We prove the existence of infinite subgroups with nontrivial locally finite radicals and of locally finite subgroups in the groups with almost finite almost solvable elements of prime orders and in the groups with generally finite elements.In this article we generalize some results of [1-10] and prove the theorems that are announced in [11,12].If the set of finite order elements is finite in an infinite group G then by the well-known theorem of Dietzmann this set forms a finite fully characteristic subgroup of G. If the set of finite order elements in G is infinite then some questions concerning their location in the group are in order [9]. One of them is the well-known question of Kargapolov [13, Problem 1.24] about the existence of infinite abelian subgroups in an infinite group, which in the general case was answered negatively by Novikov and Adyan [14].
…”
mentioning
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Assertion 1) is established for the nontrivial full part of the group D similarly to Lemma 3.5 from [2]. We therefore assume that at least one of the subgroups A and B, for instance A, has a nontrivial full part, and D contains no nonidentity full subgroups.…”
Section: In This Case Either G Has General;~ed Chernlkov Periodic Pmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Here we prove a result that enables us to generalize the theorem of [1] to the case of arbitrary periodic groups. In the proof we use the Shlmkov method from [2], and the main result of the present paper is the generalization of Theorem 3.1 in [2]. Condition 1) cannot be omitted in the theorem, because without this condition the theorem fails, in view of the ex~.mples of groups due to Novikov-Adyan [3] and 01'shanskii [4].…”
mentioning
confidence: 97%