2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.asr.2011.01.028
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On prediction of re-entry time of an upper stage from GTO

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The near linear variation of mean apogee altitude has shown the reentry time more accurately from the TLEs considered. Hence, it is proven once again that the method based on near linear variation of mean apogee altitude utilized in [6] is providing reasonably good estimates of the orbital lifetime of the rocket body. The genetic algorithm parameters are given in Table 5.…”
Section: Reentry Time Prediction For Gslv-d5mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The near linear variation of mean apogee altitude has shown the reentry time more accurately from the TLEs considered. Hence, it is proven once again that the method based on near linear variation of mean apogee altitude utilized in [6] is providing reasonably good estimates of the orbital lifetime of the rocket body. The genetic algorithm parameters are given in Table 5.…”
Section: Reentry Time Prediction For Gslv-d5mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this paper, a method to perform the lifetime estimation of an upper stage in GTO is presented as an optimal estimation problem [5, 6]. Using this method we predict the reentry time of the cryogenic stage of the Indian geosynchronous satellite launch vehicle GSLV-D5, employing the orbital data of the rocket body (R/B) in the form of two-line element sets (TLEs), which were downloaded from the Space Track Organization website (http://www.spacetrack.org/) from February 11, 2014, to April 6, 2014.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Different methods have been developed in the earlier studies to improve TLE-based re-entry prediction. Saunders et al estimated the ballistic coefficient by comparing the change in the semi-major axis according to TLE data with the change in semi-major axis due to the drag computed by propagation using an initial state from TLEs (Saunders et al 2012;Sang et al 2013;Mutyalarao and Sharma 2011;Lu and Hu 2017). Agueda et al derived pseudo-observations from TLEs and then estimated the ballistic coefficient, solar radiation pressure coefficient, state vector, or a combination of these (Agueda et al 2013;Lidtke et al 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is, however, more complex and requires the use of the eccentricity from TLEs which is generally less accurate than semimajor axis data. A method for estimating both the BC and initial eccentricity was developed by Sharma et al [16] to improve reentry prediction of upper stages in GTO [21][22][23]. Here the eccentricity and BC are estimated by fitting the apogee altitude according to propagation to TLE apogee data using the response surface methodology.…”
Section: Ballistic Coefficient Estimationmentioning
confidence: 99%