2012
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.1981798
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On Predicting Patent Litigation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The author's work undoubtedly made a significant contribution to the field of predicting patent litigations. Petherbridge [3] pinpointed the limitation of Chien's model in terms of accuracy and practicability including a high false positive rate. Comparing with our work, [3] provided an explanation illustrating a relatively rare event of the patent litigation problem while we tested the models with actual data.…”
Section: Relevant Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The author's work undoubtedly made a significant contribution to the field of predicting patent litigations. Petherbridge [3] pinpointed the limitation of Chien's model in terms of accuracy and practicability including a high false positive rate. Comparing with our work, [3] provided an explanation illustrating a relatively rare event of the patent litigation problem while we tested the models with actual data.…”
Section: Relevant Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Petherbridge [3] pinpointed the limitation of Chien's model in terms of accuracy and practicability including a high false positive rate. Comparing with our work, [3] provided an explanation illustrating a relatively rare event of the patent litigation problem while we tested the models with actual data. Even though our model shows the similar issue as Chien's work of a high misclassification potential, it can be calibrated to reduce the false positive rate under an acceptable false negative rate.…”
Section: Relevant Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations