Abstract:Background: Models-based approaches to physical education have in recent years developed as a way for teachers and students to concentrate on a manageable number of learning objectives, and align pedagogical approaches with learning subject matter and context. This paper draws on Hannah Arendt's account of vita activa to map existing approaches to physical education as oriented towards: (a) health and exercise, (b) sport and games, and (c) experience and exploration. Purpose: The aim of the paper is to outline… Show more
“…It is not our intention to restate the contents of our theoretically oriented paper in detail (see Aggerholm et al 2017). It is, however, worth briefly revisiting the central characteristics of practising for reference purposes.…”
Section: Principles Of Human Practisingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In our theoretical treatise, we outlined four non-negotiable features of a practising approach, namely that it must: (1) acknowledge subjectivity and provide meaningful challenges; (2) focus on content and the aims of practising, (3) involve the specification and negotiation of standards of excellence, and (4) provide adequate time for practising (Aggerholm et al 2017). Returning to these non-negotiable features will help underscore critical aspects of the practising model and enable us to extend our consideration of the practical implications of practising to develop movement capability.…”
Section: The Non-negotiable Features Of the Practising Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A fourth general human activity -that of practising (Sloterdijk 2013) which is concerned with the improvement of the self -is not explicitly addressed by current models. Building on our theoretical treatise (Aggerholm, Standal, Barker, and Larsson 2017), the thesis developed in this article is that a pedagogical model located in the philosophy of practising (Aggerholm 2016) is useful and complements existing models. Our specific aim is to outline how a model of human practising related to movement capability could be enacted in PE.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…
This file was dowloaded from the institutional repository Brage NIH -brage.bibsys.no/nih Barker, D., Aggerholm, K., Standal, Ø. F., Larsson, H. (2017)
AbstractBackground: Physical educators currently have a number of pedagogical (or curricular) models at their disposal. While existing models have been wellreceived in educational contexts, these models seek to extend students' capacities within a limited number of 'human activities' (Arendt, 1958).
…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This file was dowloaded from the institutional repository Brage NIH -brage.bibsys.no/nih Barker, D., Aggerholm, K., Standal, Ø. F., Larsson, H. (2017) …”
This file was dowloaded from the institutional repository Brage NIH -brage.bibsys.no/nih Barker, D., Aggerholm, K., Standal, Ø. F., Larsson, H. (2017)
AbstractBackground: Physical educators currently have a number of pedagogical (or curricular) models at their disposal. While existing models have been wellreceived in educational contexts, these models seek to extend students' capacities within a limited number of 'human activities' (Arendt, 1958). The activity of human practising, which is concerned with the improvement of the self, is not explicitly dealt with by current models. Purpose: The aim of the paper is to outline how a model of human practising related to movement capability could be enacted in physical education.Findings: Building on a theoretical exposition of human practising presented in a separate paper, this paper provides a practically oriented discussion related to: (1) the general learning outcomes as well as teaching and learning strategies of the model; (2) an outline of five activities that describe how the model could be implemented; and (3) the non-negotiable features of the model. Discussion: The model's potential contribution to the ongoing revitalization of PE as an institutionalized educational practice is discussed. Points concerning how the model relates to wider physical cultures, its position regarding transfer of learning, standards of excellence, and social and cultural transmission are considered.
Conclusion:The paper is concluded with some reflections on pedagogical models generally and how they relate to the pedagogical model of practising movement capability presented in this paper.
“…It is not our intention to restate the contents of our theoretically oriented paper in detail (see Aggerholm et al 2017). It is, however, worth briefly revisiting the central characteristics of practising for reference purposes.…”
Section: Principles Of Human Practisingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In our theoretical treatise, we outlined four non-negotiable features of a practising approach, namely that it must: (1) acknowledge subjectivity and provide meaningful challenges; (2) focus on content and the aims of practising, (3) involve the specification and negotiation of standards of excellence, and (4) provide adequate time for practising (Aggerholm et al 2017). Returning to these non-negotiable features will help underscore critical aspects of the practising model and enable us to extend our consideration of the practical implications of practising to develop movement capability.…”
Section: The Non-negotiable Features Of the Practising Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A fourth general human activity -that of practising (Sloterdijk 2013) which is concerned with the improvement of the self -is not explicitly addressed by current models. Building on our theoretical treatise (Aggerholm, Standal, Barker, and Larsson 2017), the thesis developed in this article is that a pedagogical model located in the philosophy of practising (Aggerholm 2016) is useful and complements existing models. Our specific aim is to outline how a model of human practising related to movement capability could be enacted in PE.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…
This file was dowloaded from the institutional repository Brage NIH -brage.bibsys.no/nih Barker, D., Aggerholm, K., Standal, Ø. F., Larsson, H. (2017)
AbstractBackground: Physical educators currently have a number of pedagogical (or curricular) models at their disposal. While existing models have been wellreceived in educational contexts, these models seek to extend students' capacities within a limited number of 'human activities' (Arendt, 1958).
…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This file was dowloaded from the institutional repository Brage NIH -brage.bibsys.no/nih Barker, D., Aggerholm, K., Standal, Ø. F., Larsson, H. (2017) …”
This file was dowloaded from the institutional repository Brage NIH -brage.bibsys.no/nih Barker, D., Aggerholm, K., Standal, Ø. F., Larsson, H. (2017)
AbstractBackground: Physical educators currently have a number of pedagogical (or curricular) models at their disposal. While existing models have been wellreceived in educational contexts, these models seek to extend students' capacities within a limited number of 'human activities' (Arendt, 1958). The activity of human practising, which is concerned with the improvement of the self, is not explicitly dealt with by current models. Purpose: The aim of the paper is to outline how a model of human practising related to movement capability could be enacted in physical education.Findings: Building on a theoretical exposition of human practising presented in a separate paper, this paper provides a practically oriented discussion related to: (1) the general learning outcomes as well as teaching and learning strategies of the model; (2) an outline of five activities that describe how the model could be implemented; and (3) the non-negotiable features of the model. Discussion: The model's potential contribution to the ongoing revitalization of PE as an institutionalized educational practice is discussed. Points concerning how the model relates to wider physical cultures, its position regarding transfer of learning, standards of excellence, and social and cultural transmission are considered.
Conclusion:The paper is concluded with some reflections on pedagogical models generally and how they relate to the pedagogical model of practising movement capability presented in this paper.
Competition is an essential part of youth sport. But should it also be part of the curriculum in physical education? Or are competitive activities incompatible with the educational context? While some researchers have argued that physical education should embrace the sporting logic of competition, others have criticized the negative experiences it can create for some students in school. In this article, we draw on insights from the philosophy of sport as well as educational philosophy, with the aim of questioning and critically examining the integration of competitive activities in physical education. We present and discuss four normative arguments (AVOID, ASK, ADAPT, and ACCEPT) that can each in their own way inform and guide future talks on the topic.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.