2012
DOI: 10.1074/jbc.m111.336131
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On Potential Interactions between Non-selective Cation Channel TRPM4 and Sulfonylurea Receptor SUR1

Abstract: Background: SUR1, the regulatory subunit of K ATP channels, was hypothesized to associate with TRPM4 to form novel channels, implicated in cell death following neurovascular trauma. Results: The properties of heterologously expressed TRPM4 channels are not modified by SUR1. Conclusion:The coupling between SUR1 and TRPM4 is unlikely. Significance: The roles of TRPM4 and K ATP channels in the pathogenesis of brain edema and hemorrhage should be reassessed.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
14
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
2
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…FRET was not observed between C terminus-fused Sur1 and C terminus-fused Trpm4 (Fig. 1 B ), as found previously (20), although the two did co-associate, as found in co-immunoprecipitation experiments (Fig. 1 E ).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…FRET was not observed between C terminus-fused Sur1 and C terminus-fused Trpm4 (Fig. 1 B ), as found previously (20), although the two did co-associate, as found in co-immunoprecipitation experiments (Fig. 1 E ).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Overabundant expression of Trpm4 led to a dominance of Trpm4 at the cell membrane that was associated with reduced surface expression of Sur1. These observations likely account for the failure to demonstrate Sur1-Trpm4 channels in a recently published study (20). In that study, the expression conditions used were such that Trpm4 currents were very large.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…The ability of this channel to conduct divalent cation and the higher occurrence rate in cilia (-) cells may result in chronic elevations of [Ca 2+ ] i in cilia (-) cells as has been previously reported [13]. Although we detected mRNAs of TRPP1, TRPP2, TRPV4, TRPM4, TRPM6, TRPC1 and TRPC2 in both cell types, however, this 23-pS channel exhibits distinct biophysical features compared to the individual TRP channels detected by RT-PCR, as well as to TRPV5 and TRPV6 [35,2123,2831]. We hypothesized that this channel might be a heterotetramer of TRPP2 and TRPV4.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 70%
“…However, the biophysical properties of this 23-pS channel are distinct from the individual channel mentioned above. TRPM4 can be inhibited by ATP and does not permeate to divalent cations [21]; TRPM6 has a single-channel conductance ~83-pS [22] and a much higher permeability to divalent cations [16]; TRPV5 and TRPV6 channels are characterized by voltage-dependent opening at negative potentials and extremely strong inward rectification with single-channel conductance of 75-90-pS and 40-70-pS, respectively [23,24]; TRPC1 channels are non-selective between Ba 2+ and Na + with a single-channel conductance of ~16-pS [23]; TRPC2 channels have significant higher permeability to divalent cation compared to the 23-pS channel and a single-channel conductance of ~42-pS [24]; TRPP2 channel has a single-channel conductance of 40-177-pS and can be blocked by amiloride [4]; the heteromeric TRPP2/TRPC1 channel complex functions as GPCR-activated channel with a single-channel conductance of ~40-pS [35]; finally, TRPV4 channels exhibits strong outward rectification with single-channel conductance of ~90-pS [25,26]. Therefore, based on the results obtained by Mn 2+ quenching assays (Figure 3d & 3e ) and the work of Kötten et al and Stewart et al [6,7] we focused on a potential interaction between TRPP2 and TRPV4.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Apparent FRET efficiency between nSUR1Y and different tagged and untagged Kir6.2 subunits (top), between nSUR1C and nSUR1Y with additional untagged subunits (center), between Kir6.2C and full-length SUR1Y (below, from Ref. 40), and between nSUR1Y and cSUR1C (bottom). CFPand YFP-tagged DNA constructs were expressed at 1:1 ratio in each case.…”
Section: Fluorescent Protein-tagged Fusion Proteins Generate Functionmentioning
confidence: 99%