2017
DOI: 10.1007/s00500-017-2509-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On possibility-degree formulae for ranking interval numbers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As described in Section 3.3, the expected value of the RPN for F n is interval [A n , A n ] . To compare two overlapping intervals, many methods have been proposed [49][50][51][52]. In this section, a simple and effective method of interval number ranking based on the possibility degree is used to order these interval RPNs.…”
Section: E Risk Prioritizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As described in Section 3.3, the expected value of the RPN for F n is interval [A n , A n ] . To compare two overlapping intervals, many methods have been proposed [49][50][51][52]. In this section, a simple and effective method of interval number ranking based on the possibility degree is used to order these interval RPNs.…”
Section: E Risk Prioritizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Table 1 we have studies some typical examples of ranking methods for interval orders. However, it is clear that there are many others, which are very important and useful in some context as, for example, Liu (2009), Xia and Chen (2015) or Liu et al (2018). However, we are interested on total orders in L([0, 1]).…”
Section: Ordersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The objective (11) corresponds to the total cost minimization. Constraint ( 12) avoids going from a point to itself.…”
Section: Objective Functionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Let us have two solutions s X , s Y with their corresponding non-negative intervals X = [x l , x r ], Y = [y l , y r ] and x l , x r , y l , y r ∈ R + 0 . The possibility degree of s X being greater than s Y is stated in terms of P(X ≥ Y) as in [10] and considering a user with a neutral attitude is defined as follows [11]:…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%