2002
DOI: 10.4134/bkms.2002.39.1.033
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On Positive-Normal Operators

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…If B(H) denotes the set of all bounded linear operators on a Hilbert space H, then A ∈ B(H) is said to be supraposinormal if AQA * = A * P A for some pair of positive operators Q, P ∈ B(H), where at least one of P , Q has dense range (see [11]). The operator A is posinormal (see [3], [4], [5]) if AA * = A * P A for some positive operator P ∈ B(H), called the interrupter. The operator A is coposinormal if A * is posinormal.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If B(H) denotes the set of all bounded linear operators on a Hilbert space H, then A ∈ B(H) is said to be supraposinormal if AQA * = A * P A for some pair of positive operators Q, P ∈ B(H), where at least one of P , Q has dense range (see [11]). The operator A is posinormal (see [3], [4], [5]) if AA * = A * P A for some positive operator P ∈ B(H), called the interrupter. The operator A is coposinormal if A * is posinormal.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Posinormal operators were first introduced and studied by H. C. Rhaly [30] and have also been studied by some authors; see, for instance, the papers by M. Itoh [18] and by I. H. Jeon, S. H. Kim, E. Ko [17] , S.Mecheri [25] and B. P. Duggal and C. Kubrusly [12] , A. Bucur [6].…”
Section: It Is Known That T ∈ Ct P (H) If and Only If It Is Dominant mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An interesting question is the following: Since (as alluded to in the introduction) there have been many generalizations of the Fuglede-Putnam theorem to non-normal operators, then can we prove it for posinormal operators? This notion appeared in [10,16].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%