2017
DOI: 10.1016/s0034-4877(17)30036-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On point interactions realised as Ter-Martirosyan–Skornyakov Hamiltonians

Abstract: For quantum systems of zero-range interaction we discuss the mathematical scheme within which modelling the two-body interaction by means of the physically relevant ultra-violet asymptotics known as the "Ter-Martirosyan-Skornyakov condition" gives rise to a self-adjoint realisation of the corresponding Hamiltonian. This is done within the self-adjoint extension scheme of Kreȋn, Višik, and Birman. We show that the Ter-Martirosyan-Skornyakov asymptotics is a condition of selfadjointness only when is imposed in s… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
46
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
46
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While (26) appears to give an explicit expression for Hϕ, it does not because it depends on the vector w ϕ whose dependence on ϕ is not explicit. (25) can be seen as an abstract, operator theoretic version of the so called TMS boundary condition [9,13,20]. In Section 8 we show how this condition reduces to the usual TMS condition in the case of the Fermi-polaron in R 2 .…”
Section: From This Equation and From The Strong Convergencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…While (26) appears to give an explicit expression for Hϕ, it does not because it depends on the vector w ϕ whose dependence on ϕ is not explicit. (25) can be seen as an abstract, operator theoretic version of the so called TMS boundary condition [9,13,20]. In Section 8 we show how this condition reduces to the usual TMS condition in the case of the Fermi-polaron in R 2 .…”
Section: From This Equation and From The Strong Convergencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Models of this kind have been studied extensively in the literature (see, e.g., [6][7][8][9][10][11]13,15,[18][19][20][21][22][23]28,37]) and can be defined via a suitable regularization procedure. More precisely, the formal expression (1.1) can be given a meaning in terms of a suitable quadratic form [7,10,15], which will be introduced in the next section.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is to overcome the difficulty of defining W −1 λ T λ when ℓ = 0, since owing to Proposition 3 the map W −1 λ cannot pull arbitrary functions T λ ξ back to H −1/2 (R 3 ). To our understanding, this simple fact had been overlooked in all the previous operator-theoretic approaches to the 2+1 fermionic model of TMS type [27,15,16,30,20,21,22,24,23] until when we pointed it out in [18]. We shall characterise A λ,α on the sector ℓ = 0 in Section 5.…”
Section: With Respect To the Decomposition (See Remark 2 Below)mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…More in detail, here are the results of our investigation. Our first main result is to make the auxiliary operator A λ,α acting on the space of charges completely explicit, as compared to the somewhat implicit characterisation we gave in [18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%