2019 IEEE 58th Conference on Decision and Control (CDC) 2019
DOI: 10.1109/cdc40024.2019.9029185
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On Persistency of Excitation and Formulas for Data-driven Control

Abstract: In a paper by Willems and coworkers it was shown that persistently exciting data could be used to represent the input-output trajectory of a linear system. Inspired by this fundamental result, we derive a parametrization of linear feedback systems that paves the way to solve important control problems using data-dependent Linear Matrix Inequalities only. The result is remarkable in that no explicit system's matrices identification is required. The examples of control problems we solve include the state feedbac… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
27
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…1 To simplify the technical treatment and without compromising generality, we assume that x f is reachable in T -steps, i.e., (x f − A T x 0 ) ∈ Im(C T ). 2 While the full state trajectory could be measured [13], here we show that measuring the final state is sufficient to compute minimum-energy inputs.…”
Section: Learning Minimum-energy Control Inputsmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…1 To simplify the technical treatment and without compromising generality, we assume that x f is reachable in T -steps, i.e., (x f − A T x 0 ) ∈ Im(C T ). 2 While the full state trajectory could be measured [13], here we show that measuring the final state is sufficient to compute minimum-energy inputs.…”
Section: Learning Minimum-energy Control Inputsmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…There remain fundamental open problems for learning in LQR problems, with several addressed only recently, including nonasymptotic sample complexity [4], [10], regret bounds [8], [11], [13], and algorithmic convergence [5]. Alternatives to reinforcement learning include other data-driven model-free optimal control schemes [38], [39] and those leveraging the behavioral framework [40], [41]. Subspace identification methods offer a model-based generalization to the output feedback setting [42].…”
Section: A Related Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our goal is to control an unknown system using only the privacy-sensitive inputoutput data that are potentially noisy. Data-driven control is a blooming research area and methods based on the behavioral framework have received significant renewed interest [4]- [10] since their original proposal [11], [12]. The idea of such methods is that the state representation can be replaced by a data-based representation which only uses the trajectories of the system, bypassing the need for system identification.…”
Section: A Contributionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The goal is to compute a reference-tracking LQR control, based only on precollected input-output data. We can reformulate this control problem inspired by the behavioral framework [4]- [6], [11].…”
Section: Case Study: Data Predictive Controlmentioning
confidence: 99%