2014
DOI: 10.1007/s10801-014-0568-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On permutation polytopes: notions of equivalence

Abstract: We clarify the notion of effective equivalence and characterize geometrically the effectively equivalent permutation groups. In particular, we present examples showing that the latter do not correspond to affinely equivalent polytopes thereby answering Question 2.12 of [BHNP09]. We apply our characterization to our examples.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the preceding proof, we reduced to the case that the combinatorial isomorphism sends P (g) to D(g) (for any g ∈ S n ). If we could show that then P (g) → D(g) can be extended to an affine isomorphism, Lemma 4.1 would follow from a characterization of effective equivalence by Baumeister and Grüninger [1,Corollary 4.5]. But we do not know how to do this, or whether this is even true more generally (for combinatorial isomorphisms of this form between representation polytopes of arbitrary groups).…”
Section: H a R Ac T E R I Z At I O N O F T H E B I R K H O F F P O Ly...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the preceding proof, we reduced to the case that the combinatorial isomorphism sends P (g) to D(g) (for any g ∈ S n ). If we could show that then P (g) → D(g) can be extended to an affine isomorphism, Lemma 4.1 would follow from a characterization of effective equivalence by Baumeister and Grüninger [1,Corollary 4.5]. But we do not know how to do this, or whether this is even true more generally (for combinatorial isomorphisms of this form between representation polytopes of arbitrary groups).…”
Section: H a R Ac T E R I Z At I O N O F T H E B I R K H O F F P O Ly...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If two ideal characters of G are in the same orbit under Aut(G), then the corresponding orbit polytopes of G are affinely equivalent. (If the ideal characters belong to different orbits, then it can still happen that the corresponding orbit polytopes are affinely equivalent [3], but at least for the elementary abelian groups of orders 4, 8 and 16, this is not the case.) Thus the number of orbit polytopes up to affine equivalence is at most the number of Aut(G)-orbits on the set of ideal characters.…”
Section: S O M E O R B I T P O Ly T O P E S O F E L E M E N Ta Ry a B...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Clearly, the affine symmetry group of an orbit polytope P (G, v) always contains the symmetries induced by G. Depending on the group and on the point v, there may be v tsv tv t 2 sv t 2 v t 3…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%