2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.matcom.2016.12.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On penalty-free formulations for multipatch isogeometric Kirchhoff–Love shells

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this example, the Scordelis-Lo roof [10,16,17,19,20] is investigated, demonstrating the application of the collocation method to a curved geometry with Neumann boundary conditions. The Scordelis-Lo roof is an 80 • cylinder section of length L = 50 m and radius R = 25 m, loaded by a uniform body force of −90 Nm −2 along the vertical direction (z axis, see Fig.…”
Section: Scordelis-lo Roofmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In this example, the Scordelis-Lo roof [10,16,17,19,20] is investigated, demonstrating the application of the collocation method to a curved geometry with Neumann boundary conditions. The Scordelis-Lo roof is an 80 • cylinder section of length L = 50 m and radius R = 25 m, loaded by a uniform body force of −90 Nm −2 along the vertical direction (z axis, see Fig.…”
Section: Scordelis-lo Roofmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Starting from the pioneering works of Kiendl et al [10], isogeometric Kirchhoff-Love shell formulations have been extended to non-linear material models [11,12], analysis of through-the-thickness cracks [13], damage models [14], and biological membranes [15]. Due to the rotation-free nature of these formulations, multi-patch coupling deserves special attention [12,[16][17][18][19][20].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…the small solutions to Eqs. (18)(19) or (21)(22) with λ = 6. In the cases considered, the parameters are set as follows: R = 1 m, E = 70 GPa, ν = 0.3 and ρ = 2700 kg m −3 .…”
Section: Vibrations Of a Spherical Shellmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(18)(19) -differ from those by Junger & Feit -Eqs. (21)(22) because the effect of bending stiffness is taken into account differently. However, it is observed that neither prediction is fully consistent with the value obtained through accurate numerical simulations.…”
Section: Vibrations Of a Spherical Shellmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation