2016
DOI: 10.1007/s11548-016-1444-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On-patient see-through augmented reality based on visual SLAM

Abstract: The proposed system can be smoothly integrated into the surgical workflow because it: (1) operates in real time, (2) requires minimal additional hardware only a tablet-PC with camera, (3) is robust to occlusion, (4) requires minimal interaction from the medical staff.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
37
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
1
37
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These specifications helped increase the speed of algorithm processing, as well as yielded quality and stable video streams. The projected registration error of the proposed equation is around 2.5 ± 1.5 mm relative to the 5 mm observed by Mahmoud and colleagues and a processing time of 40 ± 20 ms/frame relative to the 66.2 ms/frame observed by Mahmoud et al Our proposed EIbAR system should, therefore, not only eliminate the need for interaction that limited the Mahmoud et al system, but also be more accurate and faster than current IbR systems.…”
Section: Proposed Systemmentioning
confidence: 61%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…These specifications helped increase the speed of algorithm processing, as well as yielded quality and stable video streams. The projected registration error of the proposed equation is around 2.5 ± 1.5 mm relative to the 5 mm observed by Mahmoud and colleagues and a processing time of 40 ± 20 ms/frame relative to the 66.2 ms/frame observed by Mahmoud et al Our proposed EIbAR system should, therefore, not only eliminate the need for interaction that limited the Mahmoud et al system, but also be more accurate and faster than current IbR systems.…”
Section: Proposed Systemmentioning
confidence: 61%
“…The details are mentioned in the Table . We used these samples to compare the performance of our proposed system to that of Mahmoud et al Comparison of the two systems was based on two factors: accuracy in terms of image registration error in millimetres (mm), and processing time in terms of milliseconds per frame (ms/frame). Accuracy in terms of registration error is reflective of the Root Median Square Distance (RMSD between the two images (pre‐operative and intra‐operative) using the real‐world ( x , y ) coordinates.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations