2015
DOI: 10.1007/s40753-015-0004-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On Painter’s Paradox: Contextual and Mathematical Approaches to Infinity

Abstract: In mathematics education research paradoxes of infinity have been used in the investigation of students' conceptions of infinity. We analyze one such paradoxthe Painter's Paradox -and examine the struggles of a group of Calculus students in an attempt to resolve it. The Painter's Paradox is based on the fact that Gabriel's horn has infinite surface area and finite volume and the paradox emerges when finite contextual interpretations of area and volume are attributed to the intangible object of Gabriel's horn. … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
(20 reference statements)
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To create Gabriel's horn [8,9], one constructs the graph of 1 z . By considering the domain z ≥ z 0 , the graph is rotated about the z-axis in three dimensions to form pseudosphere.…”
Section: Proof Of the Complexity-volumementioning
confidence: 99%
“…To create Gabriel's horn [8,9], one constructs the graph of 1 z . By considering the domain z ≥ z 0 , the graph is rotated about the z-axis in three dimensions to form pseudosphere.…”
Section: Proof Of the Complexity-volumementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main obstacle of learning is the lack of experience. This claim is also relevant to the learning and understanding of infinity properties (Denbel, 2014;Tsamir & Tirosh, 2007;Wijeratne & Zazkis, 2015). Tall's (2008) mentioned in his transition-in-thinking framework that students lacked infinite experience and hence encountered difficulties when learning in a context of infinite sets.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Another type is reasoning derived from an inadequate understanding of infinity. Lacking a proper thinking tool or schema to deal with an infinite task, students could generate improper reasoning and hence the thought of infinity as singularity and incomparability (Mamolo & Zazkis, 2008;Wijeratne & Zazkis, 2015). Having been introduced to the formal concept of infinite sets comparison, whose traditional approach involves the Cantorian Set Theory, some students still struggled as they inconsistently used several criteria to compare the infinite sets without awareness of a contradiction (Tsamir, 1999).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The literature refers to studies that raise the most common difficulties in understanding infinity among students and in-service or prospective teachers. To name a few examples: its abstract nature (Manfreda Kolar and Čadež, 2012), its double dichotomy both actual and potential (Dubinsky et al, 2005a(Dubinsky et al, , 2005bMonaghan, 2001), the lack of a pictorial or mental image of what is being represented (Ángeles-Navarro and Pérez-Carreras, 2010), large finite numbers deemed as infinites (Manfreda Kolar and Čadež, 2012;Medina Ibarra et al, 2019;Singer and Voica, 2003), or contradictory intuitions when working with infinity (Fuentes and Oktac, 2014;Tirosh, 2002;Wijeratne and Zazkis, 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%