IEEE International Conference on Acoustics Speech and Signal Processing 2002
DOI: 10.1109/icassp.2002.1006013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On order statistic least mean square algorithms

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Here, we propose to utilise the estimated parameters of impulsive noise as stated in Section 3. A new and efficient strategy to determine the weighting coefficients can be established as right left right left right left right left right left right left0.278em 2em 0.278em 2em 0.278em 2em 0.278em 2em 0.278em 2em 0.278em3ptϖi=defleft left1em4pt1+ϵ(η^)ifi<KHLζ(i)ifKHLiKH+Lϵ(η^)ifiKH+L where L , which is similar to ξ in (32), is the excessive‐contamination‐elimination index for the LWS algorithm; ζfalse(ifalse) and ϵfalse(ηfalse^false) can be manipulated to achieve the optimal estimation for different situations (refer to [15, 23] for how to choose the appropriate values for these parameters). Two typical choices of ζfalse(ifalse) can be found as follows: right left right left right left right left right left right left0.278em 2em 0.278em 2em 0.278em 2em 0.278em 2em 0.278em 2em 0.278em3ptζ(i)=def1+ϵ(η^)i(KHL)2L, or right left right left right left right left right left right left0.278em 2em 0.278em 2em 0.278em 2em 0.278em 2em 0.278em 2em 0.278em3ptζ(i)=…”
Section: Robust Channel Estimation For Plcmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Here, we propose to utilise the estimated parameters of impulsive noise as stated in Section 3. A new and efficient strategy to determine the weighting coefficients can be established as right left right left right left right left right left right left0.278em 2em 0.278em 2em 0.278em 2em 0.278em 2em 0.278em 2em 0.278em3ptϖi=defleft left1em4pt1+ϵ(η^)ifi<KHLζ(i)ifKHLiKH+Lϵ(η^)ifiKH+L where L , which is similar to ξ in (32), is the excessive‐contamination‐elimination index for the LWS algorithm; ζfalse(ifalse) and ϵfalse(ηfalse^false) can be manipulated to achieve the optimal estimation for different situations (refer to [15, 23] for how to choose the appropriate values for these parameters). Two typical choices of ζfalse(ifalse) can be found as follows: right left right left right left right left right left right left0.278em 2em 0.278em 2em 0.278em 2em 0.278em 2em 0.278em 2em 0.278em3ptζ(i)=def1+ϵ(η^)i(KHL)2L, or right left right left right left right left right left right left0.278em 2em 0.278em 2em 0.278em 2em 0.278em 2em 0.278em 2em 0.278em3ptζ(i)=…”
Section: Robust Channel Estimation For Plcmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this paper, we propose two novel channel estimation algorithms incorporating robust‐least‐square estimation with impulsive noise estimation to address the aforementioned challenges posed by impulsive noise and multipath distortion to the PLC systems. The robust‐least‐square estimation, which was originally developed for dealing with the outliers in any regression problem, has been employed to combat the impulsive noise in the fading environments [1517]. Deemed as a promising solution with high breakdown point, the robust‐least‐square estimator trades computational complexity for reliability.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%