Wide field of view (WFV) push-broom optical satellites can acquire ground images over hundreds to thousands of kilometers in a single pass, thanks to their large field of view cameras consisting of tens or even hundreds of thousands of detectors, which also makes their relative radiometric correction (RRC) difficult. Existing side-slither-based RRC approaches overlook the distinct structural design of WFV push-broom optical satellite cameras, thus failing to rectify non-linear distortions in side-slither images stemming from the non-flat arrangement of camera detectors. Furthermore, these methods necessitate corresponding pixels (pixels of same ground object) covering the entire field of view (FOV) in side-slither images. However, the brief duration of side-slither imaging makes it unfeasible to cover the entire FOV with calibration data. To address these issues, we propose a novel RRC approach for WFV push-broom optical satellites, achieved based on a thorough analysis of the unique structural traits of WFV push-broom optical cameras, enabling precise standardization of the non-linear distortions in side-slither data. Additionally, a local-to-global side-slither calibration strategy is proposed to obviate the requirement for corresponding pixels to cover the entire FOV in calibration data. Experiments using the Haiyang-1D Coastal Zone Imager (HY-1D CZI) satellite indicate that our method effectively rectified non-linear distortions in side-slither data and evident RRC accuracy improvement with that of existing methods can be obtained.Index Terms-relative radiometric calibration (RRC), sideslither, wide field of view, HY-1D CZI I. INTRODUCTION emote-sensing satellites have become an indispensable means of acquiring extensive ground information, with the quality of their image products largely depending on the design of the optical imaging system and subsequent radiometric calibration. Nowadays, charge-coupled devices (CCDs) are frequently integrated into optical imaging systems, offering push-broom and whisk-broom imaging modes as alternatives. In practice, push-broom optical sensors are predominant in this field. Linear array push-broom sensors are composed of a group of independent detectors. When provided with the same radiance input, the detectors should ideally yield Manuscript received XXX. revised XXX, XXX.