2011
DOI: 10.4310/cis.2011.v11.n4.a3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On optimum strategies for minimizing the exponential moments of a loss function

Abstract: Abstract. We consider a general problem of finding a strategy that minimizes the exponential moment of a given cost function, with an emphasis on its relation to the more common criterion of minimization the expectation of the first moment of the same cost function. In particular, the basic observation that we make and use is about simple sufficient conditions for a strategy to be optimum in the exponential moment sense. This observation may be useful in various situations, and application examples are given. … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
21
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
1
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To see why this is true, observe that for large α, N (0, 1/(2α)). Thus, for D ≤ 1/(2α), the rate-distortion function of Q agrees with the Shannon lower bound (see [14]), R L (D) = log M + 1 2 log(1/[2αD]), which, for D = 1/(2α), gives a coding rate of log M , just like the aforementioned uniform quantizer.…”
Section: Applications a Quantizationsupporting
confidence: 57%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…To see why this is true, observe that for large α, N (0, 1/(2α)). Thus, for D ≤ 1/(2α), the rate-distortion function of Q agrees with the Shannon lower bound (see [14]), R L (D) = log M + 1 2 log(1/[2αD]), which, for D = 1/(2α), gives a coding rate of log M , just like the aforementioned uniform quantizer.…”
Section: Applications a Quantizationsupporting
confidence: 57%
“…Then, (x, s * ) = ln |T Q | + k log n ≈ nĤ(x) + k 2 log n, whereĤ(x) is the empirical entropy pertaining to x, and where the approximate inequality is easily obtained by the Stirling approximation. Then, as can be seen in [14]: ln E P θ exp{α (X, s)} ≤ nαH 1/(1+α) (P θ )+α k 2 log n. Rissanen's result is now obtained a special case by dividing both sides by α and taking the limit α → 0.…”
Section: Universal Asymptotically Optimum Strategiesmentioning
confidence: 83%
See 3 more Smart Citations