2000
DOI: 10.1109/48.895363
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On optimal shading for arrays of irregularly-spaced or noncoplanar elements

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For most array shapes of interest, the geometry is simply curved, so that , and extensions to more terms in the series are not necessary. Using this approximation, the integral form for in (8) is reduced to (11) Based on this expression for , the interpolation polynomial form shown in (5) is in a form that is only dependent on the array shape function and its derivatives evaluated at the element locations, as well as the inter-element array spacing.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For most array shapes of interest, the geometry is simply curved, so that , and extensions to more terms in the series are not necessary. Using this approximation, the integral form for in (8) is reduced to (11) Based on this expression for , the interpolation polynomial form shown in (5) is in a form that is only dependent on the array shape function and its derivatives evaluated at the element locations, as well as the inter-element array spacing.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The numerical optimization approaches applied to array-shading problems include linear programming techniques [1]- [3], nonlinear programming techniques [4], genetic algorithms [5], simulated annealing [6], and importance sampling [7]. In the area of beampattern matching techniques include simple recursion [8], iterative least-squares [9] and adaptive mainlobe shaping under sidelobe constraints Manuscript [10], [11]. The technique of this paper broadly falls into the category of beampattern matching; however, it uses analytical expressions as opposed to numerical procedures.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fixed beamformers have a fixed spatial directivity (not dependent on the acoustical environment), and focus on a desired sound source, thereby reducing the influence of background noise, more precisely to attenuate signals outside the line of sight. Examples of fixed beamforming are delay-and-sum beamforming [15,35], weighted-sum beamforming [24], superdirective beamforming [36], and frequency-invariant beamforming [72]. In the case of adaptive beamforming, directivity is dependent on the acoustical environment.…”
Section: Directional Microphones and Beamformersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…44,47 This is likely to occur for volume backscatter received by a moving platform and dominated by boundary sidelobe returns, because each sidelobe is directed towards a different grazing angle with respect to the boundary ͑see Ref. 41 for the receive beam patterns of the TVSS͒. The total reverberation will be the sum of the components arriving in each sidelobe, where each component follows a different parent distribution.…”
Section: Scattering Processes Approximated By Log-normal Distributmentioning
confidence: 99%