2020
DOI: 10.1007/jhep05(2020)071
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On operator growth and emergent Poincaré symmetries

Abstract: We consider operator growth for generic large-N gauge theories at finite temperature. Our analysis is performed in terms of Fourier modes, which do not mix with other operators as time evolves, and whose correlation functions are determined by their two-point functions alone, at leading order in the large-N limit. The algebra of these modes allows for a simple analysis of the operators with whom the initial operator mixes over time, and guarantees the existence of boundary CFT operators closing the bulk Poinca… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
22
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
(128 reference statements)
1
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The growing momentum results in gravitational backreaction which, in turn, imprints this exponential growth on the time-dependence of the volume of the maximal volume slices, and by extension on the particle's distance from the boundary along these slices. This characteristic behavior of momentum has been compellingly linked to the dual operator "size" which increases at the same exponential rate due to scrambling [1][2][3][4][5]; similarly, the corresponding maximal volume growth is expected to reflect the evolution of operator complexity [1,[6][7][8][9] -assuming an appropriate definition of the latter. This early-time chaotic behavior ceases around t ∼ β log S BH when the CFT operator's size saturates at its maximal O(S BH ) value and the bulk particle is swallowed up by the shifted horizon of the backreacted geometry.…”
Section: Jhep01(2022)016mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The growing momentum results in gravitational backreaction which, in turn, imprints this exponential growth on the time-dependence of the volume of the maximal volume slices, and by extension on the particle's distance from the boundary along these slices. This characteristic behavior of momentum has been compellingly linked to the dual operator "size" which increases at the same exponential rate due to scrambling [1][2][3][4][5]; similarly, the corresponding maximal volume growth is expected to reflect the evolution of operator complexity [1,[6][7][8][9] -assuming an appropriate definition of the latter. This early-time chaotic behavior ceases around t ∼ β log S BH when the CFT operator's size saturates at its maximal O(S BH ) value and the bulk particle is swallowed up by the shifted horizon of the backreacted geometry.…”
Section: Jhep01(2022)016mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent works [4,[13][14][15][16], a different definition of operator complexity was proposed, one attuned to the study of complexity generated by time evolution, that depends only on the system's Hamiltonian and a reference quantum state. The idea capitalizes on the intuition that acting with the Hamiltonian on an initially simple operator O via commutators generally help us ascend the complexity ladder.…”
Section: Krylov Basis and (A Refined Version Of) K-complexitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From the point of view of AdS/CFT and in particular HKLL bulk reconstruction, the existence of such operators is not very surprising and can be explained in terms of error-correcting codes [53]. For a different construction of CFT operators obeying canonical commutation relations, see [54,55]. Light ray operators [56] are another class of non-local operators which again obey a simple but non-trivial algebra and it was shown in [34] that in a Lorentz invariant CFT, certain operators reproduce the BMS algebra.…”
Section: Jhep11(2020)009mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The linear growth of b n ∼ an translates to exponential growth of the Kcomplexity, with characteristic Lyapunov exponent λ L = 2a. This operator growth hypothesis has been further studied and verified numerically in various examples [3,20,22,[34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42].…”
Section: Jhep12(2021)188mentioning
confidence: 93%
“…The precise map between operators and these states will not be relevant for us, but interested readers can consult e.g. [34,35] for details using the GNS construction.…”
Section: Jhep12(2021)188mentioning
confidence: 99%