1974
DOI: 10.1016/0045-7825(74)90032-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On numerically accurate finite element solutions in the fully plastic range

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
320
0
9

Year Published

1996
1996
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 902 publications
(345 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
5
320
0
9
Order By: Relevance
“…(11,14) are commonly evaluated by Gauss integration which requires the use of background integration cells. It is normal to use rectangular and triangle cells and high order quadratures.…”
Section: Stabilized Conforming Nodal Integrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…(11,14) are commonly evaluated by Gauss integration which requires the use of background integration cells. It is normal to use rectangular and triangle cells and high order quadratures.…”
Section: Stabilized Conforming Nodal Integrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Current research is focussing on developing limit analysis tools which are sufficiently efficient and robust to be of use to engineers working in practice. However, when FEM is applied some of the well-known characteristics of mesh-based methods can lead to problems: the solutions are often highly sensitive to the geometry of the original mesh, particularly in the region of stress or displacement/velocity singularities; furthermore, volumetric locking may occur in plane strain and 3D problems [11]. Although adaptive schemes with the h-version [12][13][14][15][16] or p-version FEM [17,18] have been used to try to overcome such disadvantages, and show immense promise, the schemes quickly become complex and a large number of elements are generally required to obtain accurate solutions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figure 8 shows the discretized specimens with their respective initial specific volume field v := 1+e. The rectangular domains were discretized using 2000 trilinear hexahedral elements equipped with the B-bar method for nonlinear kinematics using the so-called mean dilation technique [47,48] (see Reference [49] for a survey on the B-bar method).…”
Section: Simulations With Cubical Specimensmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, for such problems first-order shape functions (bior tri-linear interpolations) used to approximate the displacement field over a finite element exhibit convergence issues, B Gerhard A. Holzapfel holzapfel@tugraz.at 1 see, e.g., Hughes [19], Zienkiewicz and Taylor [40] and Wriggers [38]. One way to avoid this problem is to use a mixed variational formulation that hinges on the Hu-Washizu principle, where the master field appears together with additional subsidiary conditions, as first introduced by Nagtegaal et al [21] and discussed in Brezzi and Fortin [4] for small strains. It was later extended to finite strain problems by Simo et al [32] and is also well documented in the literature, by, e.g., Miehe [20] and Wriggers [38].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%