1951
DOI: 10.2307/2372180
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On Normal Operators in Hilbert Space

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
63
0

Year Published

1959
1959
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 130 publications
(65 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
63
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Of course the "only if" implication is obvious. As to the converse, we use the well-known Fuglede-Putnam theorem [7,8] …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Of course the "only if" implication is obvious. As to the converse, we use the well-known Fuglede-Putnam theorem [7,8] …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It affirms that if A and B are normal operators and AX = X B for some operator X then A * X = X B * . First, Fuglede [10] proved it in the case when A = B and then Putnam [22] proved it in a general case. There exists many generalizations of this Theorem of which most of them go into unwinding the normality of A and B (see [11,20] and some of the references cited in these papers).…”
Section: Fuglede-putnam Theorem For N-power Normal Operatorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is elementary, though tedious, to produce two 4X4 matrices, N a diagonal and X nonzero in the (1,3), (1,4), (2,3), (2,4) The general question in this section is which of the results of the earlier sections remain true for the infinite sum. The theme is to try to prove Theorem 1 in this setting.…”
Section: Ddme8:l(h)^l(h)bymentioning
confidence: 99%