2012
DOI: 10.1080/03081087.2011.653642
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On norm sub-additivity and super-additivity inequalities for concave and convex functions

Abstract: Sub-additive and super-additive inequalities for concave and convex functions have been generalized to the case of matrices by several authors over a period of time. These lead to some interesting inequalities for matrices, which in some cases coincide with, and in other cases are at variance with the corresponding inequalities for real numbers. We survey some of these matrix inequalities and do further investigations into these.We introduce the novel notion of dominated majorization between the spectra of two… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is a famous result of Ando [1]. Here the operator monotoniciy assumption is essential; see [3] for some counterexamples. A very interesting paper by Mathias [24] gives a direct proof, without using the integral representation of operator monotone functions.…”
Section: Proof Note Thatmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…This is a famous result of Ando [1]. Here the operator monotoniciy assumption is essential; see [3] for some counterexamples. A very interesting paper by Mathias [24] gives a direct proof, without using the integral representation of operator monotone functions.…”
Section: Proof Note Thatmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…The authors of [9] used inequality (1.3) to obtain some operator inequalities. In particular, they gave a generalization of the Petrović operator inequality as follows: Some other operator extensions of (1.4) can be found in [1,2,11]. In this paper, as a continuation of [9], we extend inequality (1.3), refine (1.3) and improve some of our results in [9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 58%
“…where the first inequality follows from the definition of C xyx in (12) and the submultiplicative property of the matrix norm, while the second inequality follows from [60]. A new application of the submultiplicative property readily yields…”
Section: B Proof Of Propositionmentioning
confidence: 99%