2020
DOI: 10.1007/s41980-020-00410-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On Non-split Abelian Extensions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…So, we have φ 21 • ε 1 = 1 and then φ 22 ∈ End(G 2 ). Furthermore, by using the 2-cocycle condition, the equation (10) gives us…”
Section: Let Prmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…So, we have φ 21 • ε 1 = 1 and then φ 22 ∈ End(G 2 ). Furthermore, by using the 2-cocycle condition, the equation (10) gives us…”
Section: Let Prmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As mentioned in the introduction, our choice to focus on the isomorphism problem for extensions with abelian kernel group is partially motivated by the Jordan-Hölder Theorem. Our other works of particular relevance are [8][9][10][11]. We study in [11] the isomorphism problem for split extensions, and as an application, we determine how isomorphism of split extensions and conjugacy of the images of the corresponding actions are related.…”
Section: Conclusion and Future Problemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Very recently, we study in [12] the isomorphism problem for split extensions. In [11,13], we characterize the isomorphism problem for non-split abelian extensions. In fact, most of the results of those studies do not concern general isomorphisms, but only those of certain type, namely leaving one of the two factors or even both invariant.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, this answer will not enable us to construct all possible non-isomorphic central extensions of G 1 by G 2 (the isomorphism problem). In fact, it is very hard to solve the isomorphism problem, but it has been discussed for some special cases in [8][9][10]. In fact, those results do not concern general isomorphisms, but only those of certain type, namely leaving the kernel group or both the two factors invariant, inducing the identity or a commuting automorphism on the quotient group.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%