[Proceedings] 1992 RNNS/IEEE Symposium on Neuroinformatics and Neurocomputers 1992
DOI: 10.1109/rnns.1992.268621
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On neural networks for graph isomorphism problem

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…1 are isomorphic. Therefore, the degree sequence and the degree distribution sequence of G and G are the same, i.e., [3,5,4,4] and [1,1,2], respectively.…”
Section: Theoremmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…1 are isomorphic. Therefore, the degree sequence and the degree distribution sequence of G and G are the same, i.e., [3,5,4,4] and [1,1,2], respectively.…”
Section: Theoremmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Assume that Table 2 is obtained after a comparison of all the entries in S N and S N so that S i = S i (1) (i = 1, 2, . .…”
Section: Theoremmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…and its eigenvalues could determine graph isomorphism [2], but this was not true either; graphs with different structures can have exactly the same characteristic polynomials and eigenvalues [1,3,[5][6][7][8][9][10][11].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to the number in the degree sets of the vertices, we have G:[8,5,1,2,3,4,6,7] and G :[3 , 2 , 1 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 ]. Rearrange the adjacency matrices D and D in accordance with the position order of the vertices above.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%