2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.clinph.2014.12.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On-nerve needle nerve conduction study in the sural nerve: A new technique for evaluation of peripheral neuropathy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

2
15
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

2
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
2
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For NCV analysis, we chose NP‐NCV for 2 reasons: the maximum NCV was faster by 2 m/s on SE‐NCS than on ONN‐NCS ( P < 0.0131) . There was no significant difference in NP‐NCV between SE‐NCS and ONN‐NCS (Table ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…For NCV analysis, we chose NP‐NCV for 2 reasons: the maximum NCV was faster by 2 m/s on SE‐NCS than on ONN‐NCS ( P < 0.0131) . There was no significant difference in NP‐NCV between SE‐NCS and ONN‐NCS (Table ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This analysis was based on 84 cases, all of which presented a definite histopathological diagnosis of either axonal degeneration (22 cases), demyelination (50 cases), a combination of both disorders (7), or normal findings (5) on sural nerve biopsy. In 5 patients, ONN‐NCS was not possible due to technical reasons . In 4 patients, the nerve biopsy showed end‐stage atrophy.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations