2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2013.06.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On negative retentions in organic solvent nanofiltration

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
45
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 60 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
2
45
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Negative retention indicate that the solute is enriched in the permeate stream as compared to the bulk feed concentration (Postel et al, 2013). This means that, for those membranes, the selective barrier is offered to n-hexane rather than to macauba oil.…”
Section: Permeation Assaysmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Negative retention indicate that the solute is enriched in the permeate stream as compared to the bulk feed concentration (Postel et al, 2013). This means that, for those membranes, the selective barrier is offered to n-hexane rather than to macauba oil.…”
Section: Permeation Assaysmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The different chain flexibility compared to glassy polyimide/polyamide and rubbery silicone-coated membranes results in different sorption and swelling properties, which in turn results in different rejection profiles in OSN [21]. For both glassy and rubbery membranes, negative rejection has been demonstrated to be non-negligible under certain operating conditions, and the number of publications reporting negative rejection in non-aqueous nanofiltration has increased in recent years [16,21,[23][24][25][26][27]. However, the data on negative rejection available in the literature are mostly reported as observed data.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The MB retention was higher than RB having MB lower MW. It has been reported (Postel et al 2013, Volkov et al 2014) that dye rejection can be affected by solute-membrane interactions expressed in terms of solubility parameters. To analyze the effect of solute-membrane affinity on RB and MB rejections, the solute and the membrane solubility parameters (Table 2) were used.…”
Section: Membrane Contact Angles and Mwcomentioning
confidence: 99%