2016
DOI: 10.1088/0957-4484/27/21/215502
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On nanopore DNA sequencing by signal and noise analysis of ionic current

Abstract: Scheicher, R. et al. (2016) On nanopore DNA sequencing by signal and noise analysis of ionic current. Our focus is placed on signal-boosting and noise-suppressing strategies in order to attain the single-nucleotide resolution. Apart from decreasing pore diameter and thickness, it is crucial to also reduce the translocation speed and facilitate a stepwise translocation. Our best-case scenario analysis points to severe challenges with employing plain nanopore technology, i.e., without recourse to any signal a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 92 publications
(218 reference statements)
0
14
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This observation agrees well with a previous theoretical study suggesting that increase in pore size or thickness could significantly reduce the signal, making it difficult to distinguish from the noise. 55 In addition to the pore size, the ionic current through nanopores may be affected by the electroosmotic flow (EOF) through the pore. The electro-osmotic flow (EOF) is the consequence of the electrostatic interaction between an applied electric field and a charged nanopore.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This observation agrees well with a previous theoretical study suggesting that increase in pore size or thickness could significantly reduce the signal, making it difficult to distinguish from the noise. 55 In addition to the pore size, the ionic current through nanopores may be affected by the electroosmotic flow (EOF) through the pore. The electro-osmotic flow (EOF) is the consequence of the electrostatic interaction between an applied electric field and a charged nanopore.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This contribution in Figure 6 is measured in percentages of the total flicker noise including both surface and bulk components. Note that the membrane thickness has no influence on the flicker noise as the access region 17 close to the nanopore is not considered in the model. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 13 noise level when using small-diameter pores in thin membranes to boost signal and improve base resolution in DNA sequencing.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Оскільки сигнал іонного струму крізь біологічну чи твердотільну нанопору є дуже малим за амплітудою, шум представляє значну проблему, яка суттєво обмежує чутливість нанопори. В роботах [23][24][25] наведено порівняння рівнів шуму для різних матеріалів нанопор, їх діаметрів та довжин. У [24] показано, що біологічні нанопори мають кращі показники шуму порівняно з твердодільними нанопорами.…”
Section: моделювання та аналіз сигналівunclassified