2019
DOI: 10.1007/s00021-019-0472-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On Multiple Solutions to the Steady Flow of Incompressible Fluids Subject to Do-nothing or Constant Traction Boundary Conditions on Artificial Boundaries

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The impossibility of standard energy-type estimates in case of flows with the classical "do nothing" boundary condition (1.8) (which corresponds to 𝜉 = −1 in 1.9) on a part of the boundary is demonstrated on a set of concrete examples in Lanzendorfer and Hron. 15 One can realistically expect that analogous examples can also be constructed for −1 < 𝜉 < 0. The problem lies in the fact that the energy estimates contain the integral ∫ Γ out (u • n) |u| 2 dl, which may have a "bad" sign in the case of "large" reverse flows u on Γ out , that is, flows satisfying u • n < 0.…”
Section: The Navier-stokes Boundary-value Problem On One Spatial Periodmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The impossibility of standard energy-type estimates in case of flows with the classical "do nothing" boundary condition (1.8) (which corresponds to 𝜉 = −1 in 1.9) on a part of the boundary is demonstrated on a set of concrete examples in Lanzendorfer and Hron. 15 One can realistically expect that analogous examples can also be constructed for −1 < 𝜉 < 0. The problem lies in the fact that the energy estimates contain the integral ∫ Γ out (u • n) |u| 2 dl, which may have a "bad" sign in the case of "large" reverse flows u on Γ out , that is, flows satisfying u • n < 0.…”
Section: The Navier-stokes Boundary-value Problem On One Spatial Periodmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Without the corrector 1 2 |v| 2 n, relation (1.11) is sometimes called constant traction boundary condition (cf [45]), which is just the do-nothing boundary condition (2.1), but for the symmetric part of the velocity gradient. As we shall see, we have the freedom to replace Dv in the definition of I ε by other types of gradients, leading, for example, to boundary conditions involving ∇v rather than Dv.…”
Section: Interpretation Of (110) and (111)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Prescribing the correct boundary conditions, especially at the outflow boundary, is very important in correctly capturing the physiological flow conditions within a subregion of the cardiovascular system that is being modeled [117]. From the analysis point of view, it is now known that some of the numerically convenient outlet boundary conditions, such as the Neumann, or do nothing, outlet boundary conditions, may produce instabilities [132] or ruin well-posedness by producing multiple solutions to the steady flow, as was recently shown in [77]. In this paper we consider dynamic pressure data (2.2) both at the inlet and at the outlet, which is a boundary condition that is consistent with the energy of the coupled problem.…”
Section: Description Of the Main Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%