2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.actaastro.2015.04.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On Monte Carlo simulations of the LAser RElativity Satellite experiment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 72 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A third member of this class of passive, spherical laser targets, named LARES, was launched a few years ago (Paolozzi and Ciufolini, 2013), and it will be used to try to refine the existing tests in view of its improved manufacturing and design which will reduce the direct impact of the nongravitational perturbations; according to its proponents, it should be possible to reach a ≈ 1% total accuracy (Ciufolini et al, 2013). For recent overviews of the performed and ongoing attempts to detect the Lense-Thirring effect with artificial Earth's satellites and related discussions on the realistic accuracy level reached, see, e.g., Iorio et al (2011), Ciufolini et al (2012), Renzetti (2013); Iorio et al (2013); Ciufolini et al (2013); Renzetti (2015) and references therein.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A third member of this class of passive, spherical laser targets, named LARES, was launched a few years ago (Paolozzi and Ciufolini, 2013), and it will be used to try to refine the existing tests in view of its improved manufacturing and design which will reduce the direct impact of the nongravitational perturbations; according to its proponents, it should be possible to reach a ≈ 1% total accuracy (Ciufolini et al, 2013). For recent overviews of the performed and ongoing attempts to detect the Lense-Thirring effect with artificial Earth's satellites and related discussions on the realistic accuracy level reached, see, e.g., Iorio et al (2011), Ciufolini et al (2012), Renzetti (2013); Iorio et al (2013); Ciufolini et al (2013); Renzetti (2015) and references therein.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unfortunately, the precision in the determination of the Lense-Thirring effect or the perihelion precession, even for the highly-accurate measurements of the geodynamics satellites, such as LAGEOS, is still not sufficient to evince an irrefutable discrepancy with the predictions of standard GR. It is hoped that the newly-launched LARES [44] satellite may yield an improvement in the accuracy of the ongoing and forthcoming tests of fundamental physics, although also, such a possibility is currently debated [45][46][47][48]. Although the authors of these works have given some bounds on the values of the torsion parameters, based on the known error bars from the most recent ephemerides, it is still premature to draw any firm conclusion on the need of modified theories of gravity to explain the data.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other tests of the gravitomagnetic field of the Earth have been performed in the last twenty years, and are still ongoing, with the geodetic satellites of the LAGEOS type whose Lense-Thirring orbital precessions have been measured with the satellite laser ranging (SLR) technique with increasing accuracy over the years (Ciufolini et al 2012a, 2013, Ciufolini et al 2010, Ciufolini et al 2016. Nonetheless, some aspects of them have been criticized in the literature so far, and their accuracies is the subject of a lingering debate (Ciufolini et al 2009, Ciufolini et al 2012b, Iorio et al 2011, Iorio 2011b, Iorio 2017, Renzetti 2012, Renzetti 2013a, 2013b, Renzetti 2014b, Renzetti 2015. For further planned and ongoing SLR-based investigations of the Lense-Thirring effect with the LAGEOS type satellites within the LARASE program, see Lucchesi et al (2015), Visco andLucchesi (2016, 2018) and Pucacco and Lucchesi (2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%