2002
DOI: 10.1080/09608780210143209
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On monadic domination in Leibniz’s metaphysics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
0
1

Year Published

2004
2004
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…For Look and Rutherford, this passage "testifi es to Leibniz's scepticism concerning the M-Composite View as a satisfactory explanation of corporeal substance" 11 Leibniz's account of the domination relation, which appears to have been introduced into his thinking at this time, is never clearly articulated in his writings. Interesting attempts to explicate this notion further can be found in Look ( 2002 ) and Duarte ( 2012 ). But each of these involves a good deal of philosophical speculation.…”
Section: A Response To the Textual And Philosophical Challengesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For Look and Rutherford, this passage "testifi es to Leibniz's scepticism concerning the M-Composite View as a satisfactory explanation of corporeal substance" 11 Leibniz's account of the domination relation, which appears to have been introduced into his thinking at this time, is never clearly articulated in his writings. Interesting attempts to explicate this notion further can be found in Look ( 2002 ) and Duarte ( 2012 ). But each of these involves a good deal of philosophical speculation.…”
Section: A Response To the Textual And Philosophical Challengesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cfr. Schneider [1985]; Pasini [1996Pasini [ ] e [2008; Duchesneau [1996Duchesneau [ ] e [1998; Ishiguro [1998Ishiguro [ ] e [2001; Smith [1998]; Fichant [2003Fichant [ ] e [2004; Phemister [1999Phemister [ ] e [2005; Look [2002]; Nunziante [2002Nunziante [ ] e [2004; Carvallo [2004]; Hartz -Wilson [2005]; Hartz [2007] 3 Cfr. Ishiguro [1998] Ci sono varie dottrine che qui si rincorrono: c'è l'emergere di una teoria dell'azione, c'è la connessione tra il concetto di azione e il concetto di "individuo" e c'è, naturalmente, un sostrato "dinamico" che sorregge ontologicamente la questione (nel senso che la capacità di agire propria della sostanza vivente ha un correlato fisico nella "forza" che la sostiene).…”
Section: La Substantia Vivens Negli Anni Ottantaunclassified