2015
DOI: 10.5802/aif.2961
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On Moebius and conformal maps between boundaries of {\rm CAT}(-1) spaces

Abstract: We consider Moebius and conformal homeomorphisms f : ∂X → ∂Y between boundaries of CAT(-1) spaces X, Y equipped with visual metrics. A conformal map f induces a topological conjugacy of the geodesic flows of X and Y , which is flip-equivariant if f is Moebius. We define a function S(f ) : ∂ 2 X → R, the integrated Schwarzian of f , which measures the deviation of the topological conjugacy from being flip-equivariant, in particular vanishing if f is Moebius. Conversely if X, Y are simply connected complete mani… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
51
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(54 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
51
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On the other hand, no analogue of Theorem E is available even in CAT(−1) spaces and this is perhaps the most innovative feature of our work. We stress that the lack of an analogue of Theorem E for CAT(−1) Riemannian manifolds is the main reason why the marked length-spectrum rigidity conjecture (Problem 3.1 in [BK85]) is still wide open (see Theorem 5.1 in [Bis15]).…”
Section: Remarksmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, no analogue of Theorem E is available even in CAT(−1) spaces and this is perhaps the most innovative feature of our work. We stress that the lack of an analogue of Theorem E for CAT(−1) Riemannian manifolds is the main reason why the marked length-spectrum rigidity conjecture (Problem 3.1 in [BK85]) is still wide open (see Theorem 5.1 in [Bis15]).…”
Section: Remarksmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is easy to see from the definition that the Busemann cocycle satisfies the cocycle identity B(x, z, ξ) = B(x, y, ξ) + B(y, z, ξ) for all x, y, z ∈ X, ξ ∈ ∂X. The following Lemma is well-known for CAT(-1) spaces (see [Bou96], [Bis15]), exactly the same proof goes through for boundary continuous spaces.…”
Section: Well-known Examples Of Boundary Continuous Spaces Include Ca...mentioning
confidence: 75%
“…As in [Bis15], we have the following: Proposition 5.2. Let X be a proper, geodesically complete, boundary continuous Gromov hyperbolic space.…”
Section: Well-known Examples Of Boundary Continuous Spaces Include Ca...mentioning
confidence: 97%
See 2 more Smart Citations