2010 Third International Conference on Dependability 2010
DOI: 10.1109/depend.2010.33
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On Modelling and Analysis of Dynamic Reconfiguration of Dependable Real-Time Systems

Abstract: This paper motivates the need for a formalism for the modelling and analysis of dynamic reconfiguration of dependable real-time systems. We present requirements that the formalism must meet, and use these to evaluate wellestablished formalisms and two process algebras that we have been developing, namely, Webπ∞ and CCS dp . A simple case study is developed to illustrate the modelling power of these two formalisms. The paper shows how Webπ∞ and CCS dp represent a significant step forward in modelling adaptive a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
(22 reference statements)
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this context, several works have provided ways to specify what a correct reconfiguration means. In the work of Mazzara and Bhattacharyya [22], several frameworks for describing and analyzing dynamic reconfiguration are studied, but they do not handle logics similar to Dyn-BLTL. Basso et al [3] express architectural properties in CTL with additional predicates encoding the state of the architecture, but this logic does not allow interleaving quantifiers (over sets) and temporal operators.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this context, several works have provided ways to specify what a correct reconfiguration means. In the work of Mazzara and Bhattacharyya [22], several frameworks for describing and analyzing dynamic reconfiguration are studied, but they do not handle logics similar to Dyn-BLTL. Basso et al [3] express architectural properties in CTL with additional predicates encoding the state of the architecture, but this logic does not allow interleaving quantifiers (over sets) and temporal operators.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Extensive research and development has been conducted on handling this problem [9,[17][18][19]. Run-time testing of configurations is valuable; it also has weaknesses and may require an "extensive complex virtualized infrastructure" [3].…”
Section: Solutionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Copy B (5) flows to the ship sphere (12) to be processed (13) to trigger (14) the generation (15) of shipping details that flow to main (16), where copy B is processed (17) and flows (18) to trigger the creation (11) of the report that includes bill calculation and shipping details. Figure 13 shows the FM overall workflow during reconfiguration.…”
Section: The Original View Of Office Workflowmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to support dynamic, evolving topologies at the modelling level, it is necessary to be able to express dynamic reconfiguration in the modelling language [73,76]. However, for many CPSs, the topology is likely to evolve dynamically, for example, in models of smart transportation, further increasing the complexity of the modelling task.…”
Section: Enabling Collections Of De and Ct Models To Be Combinedmentioning
confidence: 99%