1971
DOI: 10.1137/0120004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On Minimizing the Number of Multiplications Necessary for Matrix Multiplication

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
86
0
3

Year Published

1976
1976
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 144 publications
(89 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
86
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…For all sizes (m, n, p), if one of m, n, p is equal to 2, we take into account the cost of Hopcroft and Kerr's algorithm [14]. For square matrices, we also determine the cost provided by trilinear aggregating techniques.…”
Section: Filling the Tablesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For all sizes (m, n, p), if one of m, n, p is equal to 2, we take into account the cost of Hopcroft and Kerr's algorithm [14]. For square matrices, we also determine the cost provided by trilinear aggregating techniques.…”
Section: Filling the Tablesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In 1969, Strassen [20] presented an explicit algorithm for multiplying 2 × 2 matrices using seven multiplications. In the opposite direction, Hopcroft and Kerr [12] and Winograd [22] proved independently that there is no algorithm for multiplying 2×2 matrices using only six multiplications.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The arithmetic cost of such algorithms has been extensively studied (see [19], [9], [14], [24], [20], [21], [15] and further details in [10]). Additionally, their communication cost is asymptotically lower than that of the classical algorithm [4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%