2014
DOI: 10.1007/s00205-014-0731-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On Minimizers of a Landau–de Gennes Energy Functional on Planar Domains

Abstract: We study tensor-valued minimizers of the Landau-de Gennes energy functional on a simply-connected planar domain Ω with noncontractible boundary data. Here the tensorial field represents the second moment of a local orientational distribution of rod-like molecules of a nematic liquid crystal. Under the assumption that the energy depends on a single parameter-a dimensionless elastic constant ε > 0-we establish that, as ε → 0, the minimizers converge to a projectionvalued map that minimizes the Dirichlet integral… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
53
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
53
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As in the Ginzburg-Landau case, topological obstructions may imply the lack of an extension operator W 1−1/k,k (∂Ω, N ) → W 1,k (Ω, N ) (see for instance [10]). As a consequence, minimisers u ε subject to a Dirichlet boundary condition u ε = u bd ∈ W 1−1/k,k (∂Ω, N ) may not satisfy uniform energy bounds with respect to ε. Compactness results in the spirit of the Ginzburg-Landau theory have been shown for minimisers of the Landau-de Gennes functional [49,22,35,23]. However, some points that are understood in the Ginzburg-Landau theory -for instance, a variational characterisation of the singular set of the limit or a description of the problem in terms of Γ-convergence, as in [46,3,4] -are still missing, even for the Landau-de Gennes functional.…”
Section: Background and Motivationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As in the Ginzburg-Landau case, topological obstructions may imply the lack of an extension operator W 1−1/k,k (∂Ω, N ) → W 1,k (Ω, N ) (see for instance [10]). As a consequence, minimisers u ε subject to a Dirichlet boundary condition u ε = u bd ∈ W 1−1/k,k (∂Ω, N ) may not satisfy uniform energy bounds with respect to ε. Compactness results in the spirit of the Ginzburg-Landau theory have been shown for minimisers of the Landau-de Gennes functional [49,22,35,23]. However, some points that are understood in the Ginzburg-Landau theory -for instance, a variational characterisation of the singular set of the limit or a description of the problem in terms of Γ-convergence, as in [46,3,4] -are still missing, even for the Landau-de Gennes functional.…”
Section: Background and Motivationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[33,30,20,28,29,25,16,1] and the references therein). In the limit ε → 0, which is referred to as the limit of small nematic correlation length, one recovers the model (2), at least formally; rigorous statements can be found in [33,23,11,12,17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…However, our arguments hold for any real β. Models with weak anchoring surface terms have been a source of much recent research, for example in [1,8,11,17,23,28]. Next, let us introduce in full detail the problem under consideration.…”
Section: Notation and Preliminariesmentioning
confidence: 99%