2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.cma.2003.12.072
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On micro–macro interface conditions for micro scale based FEM for inelastic behavior of heterogeneous materials

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
43
0
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 62 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
43
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In fact, is doubtful to deal with SWCNTs as a continuum body, as has been shown through the great scattering observed in the Poisson's ratio calculated by using eq. (42). Therefore, the classical constitutive relations do not suitably render a continuum equivalent medium for SWCNTs.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In fact, is doubtful to deal with SWCNTs as a continuum body, as has been shown through the great scattering observed in the Poisson's ratio calculated by using eq. (42). Therefore, the classical constitutive relations do not suitably render a continuum equivalent medium for SWCNTs.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…7. The application of standard homogenization theories [41], [42] could be very promising to treat the mechanical simulation of CNTs (although our paper is not directly related to these methods), given the specific characteristics of the problem (great number of unit cells which are repeated with geometric periodicity). Likewise, it would be taken tensile, compressive, flexural and torsional behavior as the preferred set of simple loading test cases for establishing the equivalent properties into the homogenization solution.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Multiscale models are traditionally categorized into the homogenization method, where the length scales of micro-and macroproblems are sufficiently separate, and the concurrent method, see, e.g., Refs. [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20], which considers strong coupling between the scales. 2 This contribution details on the former one.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is of interest to note at this stage that this methodology has some similarities with certain superposition-based multiscale methods that have been proposed long before the concept of non-intrusiveness was introduced (see, e.g, [23] for an overview). These techniques appear in the literature under different names, for example the Chimera method [24], the variational multiscale method [25,26], the FE patches method [27], the numerical zoom [28], the strong coupling method [29], and the hp-d method [30,31]. It should, nevertheless, be stressed that these techniques lead to an approximate solution that is expressed as the sum of a global solution and a local correction whereas, in the non-intrusive strategy, the global response is completely eliminated in the zone of interest, its place being taken by the local solution.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%