Advances in Electronic Packaging, Parts A, B, and C 2005
DOI: 10.1115/ipack2005-73306
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On Measurement of Effective Silicon Backend Strength Using Bump Pull/Shear Techniques

Abstract: Integrating a low-K ILD layer within silicon is key to reducing RC delays. However, low-K ILD materials typically have low mechanical strength, making their incorporation with lead free interconnects an industry-wide challenge. It is well known that conversion to lead free first level interconnects increases die backend stresses due to the higher melting temperature and increased solder stiffness. The paper will focus on the measurement of the effective silicon backend strength after subjecting the dice to dif… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In order to predict solder joint reliability under drop conditions, it is important to increase the testing speed of package level test methods such as high-speed solder ball shear and pull [1][2][3][4]. Traditional ball shear and pull tests are not considered suitable for predicting joint reliability under drop loading, as the applied test speeds, usually lower than 5 mm/s, are far below the impact velocities applied to the solder joint in a drop test [5][6][7][8]. Recently, high-speed shear and pull test equipment with testing speeds up to several meters per second (max.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to predict solder joint reliability under drop conditions, it is important to increase the testing speed of package level test methods such as high-speed solder ball shear and pull [1][2][3][4]. Traditional ball shear and pull tests are not considered suitable for predicting joint reliability under drop loading, as the applied test speeds, usually lower than 5 mm/s, are far below the impact velocities applied to the solder joint in a drop test [5][6][7][8]. Recently, high-speed shear and pull test equipment with testing speeds up to several meters per second (max.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Currently the most popular method to evaluate the strength of the solder ball attachment is the ball shear test [6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13], which is adopted from the Joint Electron Device Engineering Council (JEDEC) standard JESD22-B117A [6]. Currently, a new method called the ball pull test has emerged as an attractive alternative to the traditional ball shear test as an interconnect monitor [11,12]. The ball pull test is a relatively new development, and there is a little information on the method.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many researchers and engineers used the conventional ball shear test (shearing speed is less than 0.8 mm/sec) to evaluate the reliability of solder joints in the past decade [7][8][9][10][11][12][13]. Huang et al (2001 and2002) first studied the ball shear test in terms of the effects of shear speed and shear height [8,9].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Overall, Sn-4.0Ag-0.5Cu solder exhibited higher shear strength than that of Sn-37Pb. An increase in shear strength of solder ball with increasing shear rate has been observed previously [4][5][6][7][8].…”
Section: Ball Shear Test With Different Speedmentioning
confidence: 57%