2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcp.2004.08.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On mass conservation in least-squares methods

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
22
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
(69 reference statements)
1
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar results using H −1 -norm least-squares functional for Stokes equations based on the velocity-pressure-stress formulation are presented in [8]. Regardless of their advantages, poor mass conservation is reported in least-squares based formulations, see e.g., [9][10][11]. Note, however, as indicated in [10], results can be improved by sufficiently weighting the mass conservation term.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 56%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Similar results using H −1 -norm least-squares functional for Stokes equations based on the velocity-pressure-stress formulation are presented in [8]. Regardless of their advantages, poor mass conservation is reported in least-squares based formulations, see e.g., [9][10][11]. Note, however, as indicated in [10], results can be improved by sufficiently weighting the mass conservation term.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 56%
“…6, the Union Jack grid with the uniform mesh spacing of 0.0179 on [−2, 2] and 0.025 on [2,5] is considered. In [10], such grid is illustrated to have special properties not necessary possessed by other configurations. The computational results are presented based on the velocity component along the axis of symmetry and corner vortex behaviors.…”
Section: Numerical Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, this changed the least-squares principle to a saddle-point problem, thereby negating one of the key advantages of LSFEMs over other methods. Subsequently, mass conservation in least-squares methods for the Stokes and the Navier-Stokes equations has been studied extensively in the literature [2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, making β larger (i.e., less error in conservation of mass) can result in faster or slower multigrid convergence, depending on the Reynolds number, Re, and the actual functional used (G is not a computationally practical functional and is rarely used). The effects of weighting the functional are demonstrated later in this paper, but, even though this can be beneficial in some situations, it should not be considered a universal solution [8].…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%