2002
DOI: 10.1016/s0166-8641(01)00012-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On maps with unstable singularities

Abstract: If a continuous map f : X → Q is approximable arbitrary closely by embeddings X ֒→ Q, can some embedding be taken onto f by a pseudo-isotopy? This question, called Isotopic Realization Problem, was raised byŠčepin and Akhmet'ev. We consider the case where X is a compact n-polyhedron, Q a PL m-manifold and show that the answer is 'generally no' for (n, m) = (3, 6); (1, 3), and 'yes' when:and ∆(f ) = {(x, y) | f (x) = f (y)} has an equivariant (with respect to the factor exchanging involution) mapping cylinder n… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
(51 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…• By recent work of the second author [31], f is a k-prem if and only if ∆ f := {(x, y) ∈ N × N \ ∆ N | f (x) = f (y)} admits a Z/2-equivariant map to S k−1 , assuming that either f is a fold map or 3n − 2m ≤ k in the smooth case. • Building on some previous work [35], [4], [27], we show that f is k-realizable if and only if ∆ f admits a stable Z/2-map to S k−1 , i.e. for some x there exists a Z/2-map ∆ f * S x → S k−1 * S x = S k+x .…”
mentioning
confidence: 60%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…• By recent work of the second author [31], f is a k-prem if and only if ∆ f := {(x, y) ∈ N × N \ ∆ N | f (x) = f (y)} admits a Z/2-equivariant map to S k−1 , assuming that either f is a fold map or 3n − 2m ≤ k in the smooth case. • Building on some previous work [35], [4], [27], we show that f is k-realizable if and only if ∆ f admits a stable Z/2-map to S k−1 , i.e. for some x there exists a Z/2-map ∆ f * S x → S k−1 * S x = S k+x .…”
mentioning
confidence: 60%
“…Alternatively, Lemma 2.7(a) can be viewed as a special case (with P = M = pt and L = ∅) of Lemma 2.7(b), which we now prove by adapting the geometric proof of the Freudenthal suspension theorem in [12] (see also [27;Lemma 7.7…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%