On Making of Micoquian Bifacial Backed Tools at Pietraszyn 49a, SW Poland

Abstract

This paper attempts to show that manufacture of Micoquian bifacial backed tools was structured. Data for this study were collected using a comprehensive analysis of artefacts from the site Pietraszyn 49a, Poland, which is dated to the beginning of Marine Isotope Stage 3. Based on the whole data set, it was possible to distinguish four stages of the manufacturing process. During manufacturing, both mineral hammer and organic hammer were used. The tools were usually shaped due to distinct hierarchization of faces. The study has also shown that the shape of bifacial tools from Pietraszyn 49a is very similar to the other Micoquian examples from central Europe. The ways of shaping of some tools are finding their counterparts also in the Early Upper Palaeolithic inventories, but the similarities are rather limited to the narrow range of preparation of bifacial form.

After the Revolution: A Review of 3D Modelling as a Tool for Stone Artefact Analysis

“…Grosman (2016) also looked forward to accessible digital lithic datasets to explore global questions. The creative re-analysis and comparison of multiple 2D geometric morphometric datasets has already shown great potential for lithic analysis (Matzig, Hussain and Riede 2021;Way et al 2022;Wiśniewski et al 2020).…”

Untitled

“…Grosman (2016) also looked forward to accessible digital lithic datasets to explore global questions. The creative re-analysis and comparison of multiple 2D geometric morphometric datasets has already shown great potential for lithic analysis (Matzig, Hussain and Riede 2021;Way et al 2022;Wiśniewski et al 2020).…”

State‐of‐the‐art overview of the Loess Palaeolithic of Poland

“…This is one of the Middle Palaeolithic in Upper Silesia where a Micoquian knife (Keilmessergruppen) workshop was recently discovered (Wiśniewski et al, 2019(Wiśniewski et al, , 2020. The cultural remains lie above the fluvioglacial sand-gravel series.…”