1975
DOI: 10.1016/0022-2836(75)90365-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On macrotubule structure

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1978
1978
1990
1990

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 14 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…3B), the protofilaments of the macrotubules were coiled at a -36°angle to the long axis of the macrotubule . The number of protofilament pairs that assembled to form a macrotubule was calculated as a function of the macrotubule diameter, the protofilament angle to the long axis, and the protofilament pair width (65). In vitro assembled macrotubules were cold labile, such that the birefringent highly refractile bundles disappeared within 60 s when 10 t1 of the preparation on a microscope slide was cooled to 4°C .…”
Section: In Vitro Assembly Of Macrotubules From Surf Clam Tubulinmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3B), the protofilaments of the macrotubules were coiled at a -36°angle to the long axis of the macrotubule . The number of protofilament pairs that assembled to form a macrotubule was calculated as a function of the macrotubule diameter, the protofilament angle to the long axis, and the protofilament pair width (65). In vitro assembled macrotubules were cold labile, such that the birefringent highly refractile bundles disappeared within 60 s when 10 t1 of the preparation on a microscope slide was cooled to 4°C .…”
Section: In Vitro Assembly Of Macrotubules From Surf Clam Tubulinmentioning
confidence: 99%