2014 IEEE Symposium on Computers and Communications (ISCC) 2014
DOI: 10.1109/iscc.2014.6912604
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On low repair complexity storage codes via group divisible designs

Abstract: Fractional repetition (FR) codes are a family of storage codes that provide efficient node repair at the minimum bandwidth regenerating point. Specifically, the repair process is exact and uncoded, but table-based. Existing constructions of FR codes are primarily based on combinatorial designs such as Steiner systems, resolvable designs, etc. In this paper, we present a new explicit construction of FR codes, which adopts the theory of uniform group divisible designs, termed GDDFR codes. Our codes achieve the s… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The concept of an FR code is introduced in the pioneer work [10], wherein the authors also proposed explicit code constructions from regular graphs and Steiner systems. Several recent studies extend the construction of FR codes to a larger set of parameters, which are mainly based on the graph theory (e.g., bipartite cage graph [11] and extremal graph [12], [13]) and combinatorial designs (e.g., transversal designs [12], resolvable designs [14], group divisible designs [15], Hadamard designs [16], perfect difference families [17], relative difference sets [18] and partially ordered sets [19]). Further, Pawar et al [20] proposed a randomized scheme for constructing FR codes, which is based on the balls-and-bins model.…”
Section: A Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The concept of an FR code is introduced in the pioneer work [10], wherein the authors also proposed explicit code constructions from regular graphs and Steiner systems. Several recent studies extend the construction of FR codes to a larger set of parameters, which are mainly based on the graph theory (e.g., bipartite cage graph [11] and extremal graph [12], [13]) and combinatorial designs (e.g., transversal designs [12], resolvable designs [14], group divisible designs [15], Hadamard designs [16], perfect difference families [17], relative difference sets [18] and partially ordered sets [19]). Further, Pawar et al [20] proposed a randomized scheme for constructing FR codes, which is based on the balls-and-bins model.…”
Section: A Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…which completes the proof. We refer to the inequality in (15) as the dual bound on the supported file size. Then, the dual bound in (15) gives This bound can be achieved by the (9, 2, 6, 3)-FR code listed in the database [21] with the following incidence matrix: …”
Section: B An Improved Dual Boundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Each subfile is stored in K node, and the size of coded packet is / B fK . codes have advantages in storage overhead, followed by the LRC based on (6,4,12,2) FR code. The storage overhead of SRC is the larges t(see Figure 5).…”
Section: Storage Overheadmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this case, we can adopt a [9,7] MDS code as the outer code such that the seven source symbols can be decoded from any three storage nodes. When a storage node fails, the lost symbols can be recovered by downloading the corresponding replicas from other surviving nodes.…”
Section: Flexible Fractional Repetition Codesmentioning
confidence: 99%