Proceedings of the 2018 ACM Symposium on Principles of Distributed Computing 2018
DOI: 10.1145/3212734.3212757
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On Local Distributed Sampling and Counting

Abstract: *

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

4
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We need the following proposition, which explains the relation between the multiplicative form of decay in (26) and the additive form of decay in (6). Similar results appeared in [1,2,17,48].…”
Section: Analysis Of Strong Spatial Mixingmentioning
confidence: 65%
“…We need the following proposition, which explains the relation between the multiplicative form of decay in (26) and the additive form of decay in (6). Similar results appeared in [1,2,17,48].…”
Section: Analysis Of Strong Spatial Mixingmentioning
confidence: 65%
“…(1) the SSM usually holds with respect to logarithmic potential functions [1,32,11]; (2) in [8], a local self-reduction is constructed to show that for self-reducible classes of spin systems, SSM with additive error can be boosted to the SSM with multiplicative error.…”
Section: List Coloring and Our Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Lazy Local Metropolis algorithm in above two theorems is communication-and computationefficient: each message consists of at most O(log n) bits and all local computations are fairly cheap. In a concurrent work [16], through network decomposition [22,38], a O(log 3 n)-round algorithm is given for sampling proper q-colorings of triangle-free graphs with maximum degree ∆ assuming q ≥ (α * + δ)∆, however, with messages of unbounded sizes and unbounded local computations.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%