1996
DOI: 10.1007/3-540-61363-3_4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On liveness and controlled siphons in Petri nets

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
168
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 142 publications
(172 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
168
0
Order By: Relevance
“…234 A net is said to be completely controllable if any marking is reachable from any other marking. 34 In an ordinary Petri net, a siphon is said to be controlled if it cannot be unmarked at any reachable marking.…”
Section: Controllability Conditions Of Siphonsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…234 A net is said to be completely controllable if any marking is reachable from any other marking. 34 In an ordinary Petri net, a siphon is said to be controlled if it cannot be unmarked at any reachable marking.…”
Section: Controllability Conditions Of Siphonsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Let (N , M 0 ) be an ordinary net and P be the set of its siphons. 31,234 The net is deadlock-free if 8S 2 P, 8M 2 R(N, M 0 ), M(S).0.…”
Section: Controllability Conditions Of Siphonsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The key reason is that the Petri net modeling framework might not be able to express the MPLE property for general process-resource nets; as a result, the problem of MPLE control synthesis based on siphon analysis in nonordinary nets has not been well-resolved yet [13]. In [1], the "max-controlled-siphon-property" is proposed; however, siphon-based control synthesis by enforcing this property is not maximally permissive in general.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%