2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2010.07.065
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On-line set-point optimisation and predictive control using neural Hammerstein models

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Figure 10 shows the movement of set points toward the optimum set point values verses the number of iterations. As the iteration number progresses, the two set-points 22 12 and c c whichare moving slowly toward the optimum values and lastly it stopped when the tolerance error for the optimum set points has been achieved …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Figure 10 shows the movement of set points toward the optimum set point values verses the number of iterations. As the iteration number progresses, the two set-points 22 12 and c c whichare moving slowly toward the optimum values and lastly it stopped when the tolerance error for the optimum set points has been achieved …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…9 Some of the recent studies carried out on the application of ANN models with the RTO strategies have demonstrated the potential of these strategies in determine optimal operating conditions for large-scale processes. 10,11,12 The objective of this study is to explore the effect of the neural network process model application on the modified two step (MTS) technique 13 for overcoming the problem of plant-model mismatch. The MTS is a control algorithm that employs the adaptive modifier scheme for determining the optimal control set-points.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1, which is composed of plant-wide optimization (a plant-wide optimizer determines optimal steady-state settings for each unit in the plant [6]), Local Steady-State Optimization (LSSO, which calculates on-line economically optimal set-points for the supervisory control layer in such a way that the production profit is maximized and the constraints are satisfied [16]), MPC and basic feedback control. The control action is performed by a number of regulators working at different time scales in hierarchical multilayer systems [6,16,17,18]. The MPC portion can be further divided into a SSTC and a Dynamic Optimization (DO, which is the rolling optimization in the MPC which has been applied extensively) [6].…”
Section: Two-layer Model Predictive Controlmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The nonlinear model is linearized at each sample instant and a linear model with state-space representation is obtained and applied for MPC. Lawrynczuk proposes a MPC algorithm based on linearization locally for neural network models, and applies it for polymerisation reactor [20], pH neutralization process [21] and yeast fermentation biochemical reactor [22].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such as developing a neural network model, it is easy to make a large number of simulations to feed the neural network whereas it is more difficult to make the experiments that will also lack the same reproducibility. The empirical approaches include polynomial approximations (e.g., autoregressive moving average model with exogenous inputs, ARMAX) [13][14][15], artificial neural networks [16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23], piecewise linear models [24], Volterra series [25], Wiener and Hammerstein models [19][20][21], etc. In the above empirical models, neural network models have found wide applicability because of their inherent capability of handling complex and nonlinear problems and reducing the engineering effort required in controller model development.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%