2001
DOI: 10.1016/s0959-1524(00)00012-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On-line relay identification, assessment and tuning of PID controller

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
13
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The reason for this phenomenon can be found in analog control, where pneumatic controllers were dominant. When pneumatic controllers were dominant, the PID algorithm was difficult to design due to its use of extremely expensive analog amplifiers [7]. Despite this drawback, Astrom and Hagglund [2] indicated that the ISA allows complex zeroes and is thus a more flexible structure than the series algorithm, which has real zeroes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The reason for this phenomenon can be found in analog control, where pneumatic controllers were dominant. When pneumatic controllers were dominant, the PID algorithm was difficult to design due to its use of extremely expensive analog amplifiers [7]. Despite this drawback, Astrom and Hagglund [2] indicated that the ISA allows complex zeroes and is thus a more flexible structure than the series algorithm, which has real zeroes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A variety of structure identification methods are under development. A popular and frequently used method is the relay feedback for both the off-line and on-line automatic identification of the PID [7]; however, relay feedback has disadvantages because it is unacceptable for a few classes of processes, such as unstable and integrals of the second-order processes. A different approach to identify PI structures was shown in [11], where artificial intelligence was used and PI algorithms were treated as a black box [12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The approach adopted is similar to Panigrahi & Mujumdar (2000) and Cancelliere et al (2002), but with different modelling and operational aspects. Indeed the AFDCS is based on a full description of the reservoir model, based on a hybrid model (Gollu & Varaiya 1989) and non-linear Proportional-Integral (PI) strategies (Ho et al 1998;Tan et al 2001) for reservoir gate regulation, which first allows the decision strategy to be defined and then to control water releases. Further novel aspects with respect to the above works are the use of different fuzzy input variables and a Monte Carlo technique to tune the parameters of fuzzy rules systems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such tuning rules, to compensate delayed processes by either minimising a performance criterion, or achieving a specified gain and/or phase margin, are discussed when the SISO process is modelled in IPD form (Kookos et al 1999), or stable or unstable SOSPD form ( Luyben 2000). Alternatively, ultimate cycle tuning rules, and modifications of the rules in which the proportional gain is set up to give a closed loop transient response decay ratio of 0.25, or a phase lag of 0 135 , may compensate general, possibly delayed, stable or unstable processes (Hay 1998;Tan et al 1999;Yu 1999;Prashanti and Chidambaram 2000;Tan et al 2001;Robbins, 2002a), sometimes to achieve either a specified gain and/or phase margin ( Prashanti and Chidambaram 2000;Tan et al 2001) or a specified closed loop response (Vrancic et al 1999(Vrancic et al , 2001). The controller settings are easily calculated; however, the system must generally be destabilised under proportional control, the empirical nature of the method means that uniform performance is not achieved in general, several trials must typically be made to determine the ultimate gain, the resulting process upsets may be detrimental to product quality, there is a danger of misinterpreting a limit cycle as representing the stability limit and the amplitude of the process variable signal may be so great that the experiment may not be carried out for cost or safety considerations.…”
Section: Tuning Rulesmentioning
confidence: 99%