2008 Third International Conference on Pervasive Computing and Applications 2008
DOI: 10.1109/icpca.2008.4783693
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On-Line Ranging for Mobile Objects Using ZIGBEE RSSI Measurement

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…From the above findings, we can say that the proposed BOTH filtering algorithm could reduce more average error and maximum error distance than other existing algorithm [4], [12], [27], [28]. The average reduction of distance error deduced by using the proposed BOTH filtering is 56% and 68% average error and maximum error, respectively than the existing RSSI filtering [4] and Fusion filtering [27].…”
Section: Experimental Performancementioning
confidence: 71%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…From the above findings, we can say that the proposed BOTH filtering algorithm could reduce more average error and maximum error distance than other existing algorithm [4], [12], [27], [28]. The average reduction of distance error deduced by using the proposed BOTH filtering is 56% and 68% average error and maximum error, respectively than the existing RSSI filtering [4] and Fusion filtering [27].…”
Section: Experimental Performancementioning
confidence: 71%
“…Reference nodes broadcast a message to inform their position at regular intervals. Unknown nodes receive the broadcast message from reference nodes and measure the strength of the received signal [4], [27], [28]. Localization errors for this method range from two to three meters at average, with indoor errors being larger than outdoor ones.…”
Section: Converting Signal Strength To Distancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…From the above findings, we can say that the proposed BOTH filtering algorithm could reduce more average error and maximum error distance than other existing algorithm [8,13,18,19]. The average reduction of distance error deduced by using the proposed BOTH filtering is 56% and 68% average error and maximum error, respectively, than the existing RSSI filtering [18] and fusion filtering [13].…”
Section: Experimental Performancementioning
confidence: 83%
“…Different sensors provide different range of accuracy from centimeters to room level. One of these is the physical means used for localization, for example, through the RF attenuation in the electromagnetic (EM) waves [4,9,10,14] or the time required to cover the distance between transmitter and receiver (ultra-wideband). If using ultrasonic pulses, one could also use the time of arrival or time difference between the arrivals of the waves [15].…”
Section: Related Work and Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The aim of this paper is to achieve an efficient localization algorithm via integration of previous proposals [5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13]. In this paper, the proposed protocol intends to improve the existing algorithms using RSSI and link quality indicator (LQI) values.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%